The second name is always called the specific name, because it
shows us that from all other roses our new _Rosa alba_ differs in being
white. It is of the genus _Rosa_, but it is also and forever after a
recognized member of _Rosa_, to which a specific name has been
applied--in other words, _Rosa alba_ is a species of rose. Species are
thus plants more like one another than they are like any other member of
the genus to which they belong. _Rosa alba_ is a species quite unlike
_Rosa lucida_, or _Rosa carolina_, or all the other scores of roses
already known or described. At the time of christening _Rosa alba_, we
should not only enter its name in a book, as ours would be in a parish
register, but do much more than that. We should so carefully describe it
and, preferably, illustrate it with a picture that no one coming after
could ever mistake _Rosa alba_ for any other rose. It can be readily
seen that the christening of new plants is very nearly as serious an
affair as christening babies, and furthermore, it is only to be
attempted by experts. Because this has not always been done, many plants
have been christened two or three times. Of course, these subsequent
christenings do not seriously matter, for plants, like ourselves, should
have only one specific name, the first applied to them. But their
subsequent christenings by the careless and ignorant have enormously
increased the difficulty of talking or writing about plants. These
spurious names are common throughout the literature of botany and are
known as synonyms.
The thing to remember about plants, so far as our need for classifying
them is concerned, is that they belong to different species which might
almost be considered the unit or simplest recognizable category into
which they may be sorted. For convenience, we sort species into genera
which may well be considered the next highest category in which plants
are grouped. The grouping of genera into tribes, of tribes into
families, and of families into still larger categories, has nothing to
do with their names, but everything to do with our understanding of how
they are related to one another, and what these different categories
mean in the great collection of plants all about us. In other words, it
reduces to a definite system an apparently hopelessly mixed-up mass of
plants that, without some contrivance of the sort, would simply be a lot
of totally unrelated specimens of plant life. Actually they are grouped
in fairly definite categories, some of which are easily recognizable,
and all of which fit into that great scheme of nature where everything
may seem chaotic, but to the observant it is really a very pattern of
order. What it all means and how plants have been grouped into families
will be explained, now that we understand how they have acquired their
generic and specific names.
PLANT FAMILIES AND ORDERS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account