Boys' Book of Indian Warriors and Heroic Indian WomenSabin, Edwin L. (Edwin Legrand)
History
Boys' Book of Indian Warriors and Heroic Indian Women
Sabin, Edwin L. (Edwin Legrand)
Indians of North America -- Biography; Indians of North America -- Wars
They had a similar treaty with the United States. They thought that
they owned their lands. They had been improving them and living on
them for years. They had spent much money of the tribe, for tools and
buildings, and were becoming like white men. The Government had issued
papers to them, showing which land each man possessed.
Now they were liable to lose their lands, as the Poncas had lost.
The Omahas hastened to ask white lawyers about it. They were told that
the papers did not show that they owned the land; the papers only
showed which lands each man had a right to farm.
The Omahas were Indians, and not white citizens, and could not own
lands, man by man. When a man died, his land might be given to
somebody else.
Now dread fastened upon the Omaha tribe. They hastened to draw up a
petition to Congress, asking that the lands which their men owned or
thought they owned be put down on paper forever. They wanted titles
such as the white men had, so the lands could be recorded.
Miss Alice Fletcher, from Washington, had been sent to study the Omaha
people; and they appealed to her. She helped them. The petition went
to Washington, but the months passed without an answer.
Meanwhile Standing Bear and his bag of bones and his party were being
taken south, by the soldiers from Fort Crook, Omaha, to the sickly hot
country. When they camped on their way, near Omaha, a newspaper man
talked with them. His name was Mr. T. H. Tibbles.
The story was printed in the Omaha papers, and at once Standing Bear
had many white allies.
The Omaha City people invited him to come in and talk to them; and so
he did, in a church that was crowded with listeners. Two lawyers, Mr.
Poppleton and Mr. Webster, adopted him as a client; and before the
soldiers had started on with him, the lawyers asked the court for a
writ of habeas corpus--a challenge to the United States to surrender
him, as a person who had been unlawfully arrested.
The United States argued that Standing Bear was an Indian, and that an
Indian was not a "person," under the laws of the United States; he did
not have any rights, in court.
Standing Bear had left his tribe, and was nobody, until he returned;
and even then, he would be only an Indian.
Standing Bear's lawyers brought witnesses into court, to state that the
Standing Bear party had traveled peacefully, like good citizens; had
not even begged along the way.
Standing Bear was told to arise and repeat his story. Part of it is
contained in this chapter. It was a remarkable speech. The people in
the court-room believed it. Standing Bear's heart warmed. He was no
Indian; he was a man.
The judge decided. He said that an Indian was a person, and had a
right to the courts, and to liberty when he had not done wrong. The
Poncas had been unjustly removed by force from their lands, and
Standing Bear's party had been unjustly arrested. Therefore they
should be released.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account