Bradford's history of the Plymouth settlement, 1608-1650: Rendered into modern English by Harold PagetBradford, William
History
Bradford's history of the Plymouth settlement, 1608-1650: Rendered into modern English by Harold Paget
Bradford, William
Massachusetts -- History -- New Plymouth, 1620-1691; Pilgrims (New Plymouth Colony) -- Early works to 1800
hereby determine and conclude, that if any divisions already made
and accorded by either of the said townships do cross the said
line, that then it shall stand and be in force according to the
former intents and purposes of the said towns granting them—the
marshes formerly agreed upon excepted; and that no town in either
jurisdiction shall hereafter exceed, but contain themselves within
the said lines expressed.
In witness whereof we, the commissioners of both jurisdictions, do
by these presents indented set our hands and seals, the ninth day
of the fourth month in the 16th year of our sovereign lord, King
Charles, and in the year of Our Lord, 1640.
WILLIAM BRADFORD, Governor JOHN ENDICOTT
EDWARD WINSLOW ISRAEL STOUGHTON
The extended New Plymouth patent having been taken out in the name
of William Bradford, as in trust, ran in these terms: “To him, his
heirs, associates, and assigns.” But the number of freemen having
now greatly increased, and several townships being established and
settled in several quarters such as New Plymouth, Duxbury, Scituate,
Taunton, Sandwich, Yarmouth, Barnstable, Marshfield, and not long
after Seekonk,—afterwards called at the wish of the inhabitants
Rehoboth,—and Nauset, it was desired by the Court that William
Bradford should make surrender of the same into their hands. This he
willingly did.
In these two years they had several letters from England, asking them
to send some one over to end the business of the accounts with Mr.
Sherley, who now professed he could not make them up without help
from them, especially from Mr. Winslow. They had serious thoughts of
it, and the majority of the partners here believed it best to send;
but they had formerly written such bitter and threatening letters
that Mr. Winslow was neither willing to go himself, nor that any
other of the partners should do so; for he was convinced that if
any of them went they would be arrested, and an action for such a
sum laid upon them that they would be unable to procure bail, and
would consequently be imprisoned, and that then the partners there
could force them to do whatever they wished. Or else they might be
brought into trouble by the archbishop’s means, as things then were
over there. But though they were much inclined to send, and Captain
Standish was willing to go, they decided, since they could not agree
about it and it was of such importance, and the consequences might
prove dangerous, to ask Mr. John Winthrop’s advice. It seemed the
more suitable because Mr. Andrews had in many letters acquainted
him with the differences between them, and appointed him his assign
to receive his part of the debt; and though they declined to pay
anything as a debt till the controversy was ended, they had deposited
£110 in money in his hands, for Mr. Andrews, to be paid to him in
part as soon as he should come to any agreement with the rest. But
Mr. Winthrop was of Mr. Winslow’s mind, and dissuaded them from
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account