Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
History
Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
Great Britain -- History, Military -- 19th century; Great Britain. Army -- Biography; Soldiers -- Great Britain -- Biography; Victoria Cross
At this period duelling was an established custom in the British army,
and some of the Highland officers were as ready to take offence as Sir
Lucius O’Trigger in _The Rivals_, or the redoubtable Captain MacTurk in
_St. Ronan’s Well_. They were jealous of their personal honour, and as
ready to challenge one another as those of a different race. We read of
a Captain Campbell who fought a duel in a dark room without seconds, and
killed his opponent. The absence of witnesses led the jury to give a
verdict of murder, and the unfortunate man was hanged. A duel was fought
at Gibraltar, in 1795, between Captain, afterwards Colonel Cameron, and
Lieutenant, afterwards Sir John Maclean, in consequence of some disputed
point of precedency. Both escaped without any serious injury. The
Marquis of Huntly, the colonel of the 92nd, to which Cameron and Maclean
belonged, took them to task for their conduct, and warned his officers
against the practice of duelling. “I have the more right to insist upon
this,” he said, “as I believe you are all, more or less, connected with
my father’s estates.” The hot-blooded Cameron started to his feet. “I,”
he exclaimed, “have no connexion with your father’s estates or your
father’s clan; such an argument, therefore, cannot apply to me.” The
marquis knew how to soothe his wounded feelings, and this was his first
and last duel. Nothing more readily rouses a Highlander’s ire than any
insult offered to his country, his language, or his dress, and strangers,
ignorant of this peculiarity, were sometimes involved in quarrels without
any intention of giving offence. We remember the case of an English
officer, the nephew of an archbishop, who happened to be seated at a
mess-room table opposite to a Highlander who wore the national costume,
the uniform of his regiment. They were strangers to one another, and it
was their first and last meeting in this world. The English officer made
some bantering remark on the Highlander’s dress, which was regarded by
the latter as an insult, and led to an immediate challenge. They agreed
to settle their difference at once, and on the first exchange of shots
poor Mr. ⸺, the English officer, fell. Highland soldiers have now learned
to bear any amount of “chaff” on their national peculiarities without
taking offence, but national feeling was stronger and more sensitive in
former days, and the barbarous custom of duelling often led to death
in cases where an apology would now be deemed ample atonement. It is
somewhat remarkable that the horror excited by the death of an Indian
officer, slain in mortal combat by his own brother-in-law, an officer of
the Life Guards, and a Highlander by birth, produced such a reaction,
that the custom of duelling—that barbarous relic of a barbarous age—may
now be regarded as obsolete.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account