Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
History
Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
Great Britain -- History, Military -- 19th century; Great Britain. Army -- Biography; Soldiers -- Great Britain -- Biography; Victoria Cross
There are certain acts of courage which compel our admiration without
obtaining the unqualified approval of our cooler judgment. Colonel Bell’s
daring in capturing the Russian gun must be placed in this category.
No one will question his courage, or dispute his right to the Cross of
Valour; no one will wish his deed undone, or desire that he had acted
otherwise. And yet it must be admitted that in leaving his own men he
was guilty of a breach of discipline which is more worthy of admiration
than imitation. It was his duty to have remained with his company;
and if every officer were to yield in battle to the same impulsive
bravery, all discipline would be at end and the results would be most
disastrous. The first duty of all soldiers is implicit obedience to the
commands of superior authority; to this rule there is no exception, save
in the case of officers of high rank, who on the field of battle must
always be guided partly by circumstances in executing the orders they
have received. We are not, therefore, to condemn Sir George Brown for
expressing his emphatic disapproval of Captain Bell’s conduct in leaving
his company to seize the Russian gun. Sir George, doubtless, admired his
courage, but he must have felt that courage ought in every case to be
subordinate to discipline. Such was the opinion of Sir Colin Campbell
at the storming of the Secunder Bagh at Lucknow. We shall describe in a
future chapter the fearful scene of carnage which took place there in
consequence of the massacre at Cawnpore. The tumult was at its height
when a Highland officer rushed up to the spot where Sir Colin, mounted
on his grey horse, stood in the centre of his staff. The Highlander was
wild with excitement, and bore on his person traces of the bloody work
in which he had taken part. One word of praise from those stern lips
was the richest reward his heart could covet. Extending the red banner
which he held in his hand towards the general, he joyfully exclaimed, “I
have killed the last four of the enemy with my own hand, and here, sir,
are their colours.” A Highlander himself, Sir Colin could appreciate
the impetuous courage of his countryman, but his duty as a general
was imperative; he could not applaud an act which was a violation of
discipline. “Confound the colours, sir! where’s your regiment? Go back
to your regiment, sir! I thank you for your zeal and gallantry, but go
back to your regiment.” The excited and impulsive Highlander obeyed
this command, and, doubtless, felt at the moment that the reproof,
though grave, was not unmerited. Such also must have been the feelings
of Captain Bell when he received the stern command to return to his
company and relinquish the Russian gun. If that gun had not remained
in our possession after the battle, we doubt whether Colonel Bell’s
undisciplined valour would have met with the same recognition from his
grateful country. Success may sometimes justify such a step, but we
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account