Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
History
Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
Great Britain -- History, Military -- 19th century; Great Britain. Army -- Biography; Soldiers -- Great Britain -- Biography; Victoria Cross
This anecdote leads us to notice another trait in the character of
our Highland soldiers; they were emphatically religious men, and they
were prepared to make any sacrifice for their faith. They were little
versed in theology, but, like Cromwell’s Ironsides at Dunbar, they put
their trust in God and kept their powder dry. The great mass of them
were Presbyterians, and in foreign and far-distant lands they continued
to worship as their fathers had worshipped. Soldiers at that period
were the most irreligious of men; they “swore terribly in Flanders”
and elsewhere. We may form some idea of their morals from Hogarth’s
well-known “March to Finchley.” Any display of religious feeling on the
part of a soldier excited such surprise as to prove its extreme rarity,
especially in the case of the Highlanders, who were esteemed at first to
be little better than savages. When the 42nd Regiment first visited the
metropolis, the Londoners were surprised to observe that officers and men
never sat down to table without first saying grace—a religious observance
which should be honoured, but which has become obsolete in our mess-rooms
at the present day. An English historian shows how surprised his
countrymen were “to see these savages, from the officer to the commonest
man, first stand up and pull off their bonnets, and then lift up their
eyes in the most solemn and devout manner, and mutter something in their
own gibberish, by way, I suppose, of saying grace, as if they had been
so many Christians.” Of course, in the eyes of this wiseacre, they could
not have been Christians, because they expressed their devotion in a
gibberish which, as he charitably implies, was as unintelligible to the
Deity as it was to himself; but we know how to judge these things by a
different standard, and we condemn the man who could write so narrowly.
At first a chaplain was attached to every regiment, and Dr. Carlisle,
of Inveresk, mentions in his memoirs, that one of these chaplains,
during an engagement in America, freely exposed himself to the fire of
the enemy, in order to encourage the young soldiers by his example. We
question whether such a display of clerical courage would meet with the
approval of the authorities at the War Office at the present day; certain
facts have come under our notice that would tend rather to an opposite
conclusion. These regimental chaplains had to mess with the officers, and
it was imagined that the presence of a clergyman would have an elevating
influence upon the latter; experience, however, soon proved that the
chaplains, instead of elevating the officers, were, through daily
contact, brought down to the same moral level, and it is a significant
fact that Burns, although his national spirit was great, considered them
fair game for his satire. About the commencement of the present century
chaplains were attached to brigades and not to regiments, and this
continued to be the case during the Peninsular war. It thus occasionally
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account