British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
how at first both sides used the cordon-system; how the French, after
abandoning it with success, relapsed into it once more; and finally how
the Allies, also abandoning it under British direction, in their turn
gained the upper hand.
Throughout this anxious period the interference of Dundas with the
operations had been incessant, and his tone by no means the most
courteous. The incoherence and folly of his orders may best be judged
from a summary of the reply which Murray at length found time to
write on the 20th of October. “Let me point out to you,” he wrote,
in effect, “that the same messenger brought to me from you, first,
advice to besiege St. Quentin; secondly, orders to keep a body of
troops at Ostend; and, thirdly, strong exhortations against division
or detachment of our force. As to Ostend, if Nieuport holds out, it is
safe for the winter; and I see no reason why Nieuport should not hold
out. As to St. Quentin, this means taking a train of artillery there
in the month of November. It means also that twenty thousand out of
Coburg’s twenty-five thousand men must be detached, while the remaining
five thousand remain quietly between three fortified towns and a
forest, from which fifty thousand men may attack them from all sides at
any time. Further, the detached force must draw its subsistence from
a distance of forty miles across the whole French army without any
other protection than that of those five thousand men.” “I beg pardon,”
he continued, “for taking up your time with this kind of argument,
which it was not your intention to enter into, but I think it is right
to show that, perhaps, people in England are not more infallible in
their judgments than those upon the Continent.” Irony so keen sped
home even through the dense armour of Dundas’s conceit. “You have
not sufficiently weighed the feeling of this country,” he answered,
taking refuge in bluster, “if you think that any successes could have
counterbalanced the loss of Ostend.” Murray hastened to soothe him by
pointing out that the Duke of York, though against his own military
judgment, had strictly obeyed the Cabinet’s instructions as to the
protection of Ostend, and that it was not Grey who had saved it but
the Duke himself, who, before he knew of Grey’s arrival, had forced
Vandamme to retire by threatening his communications.[180]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account