British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
On the military side Carnot had decided to strike at important points
only, and elsewhere to stand on the defensive. In the south he
designed to invade Italy, hoping that treachery at Turin would make
the work easy; but the principal struggle, as he knew, must be fought
out in Belgium. He did not, however, confine his schemes of aggression
to that quarter only. He recognised with true insight that Britain
was France’s most formidable enemy; and he had actually projected
and prepared for an invasion of England, with the help of the Brest
fleet, and for a march upon London. The plan was bold, indeed wild
in its extravagance, being founded on a false idea that disaffection
in England was as deeply seated and as widely spread in action as it
was noisy and inflated in speech. None the less the bare menace of
invasion served a useful purpose—to scare and disconcert the British
Government.[185]
◆Jan. 21.◆ In truth it must have been with no very pleasant feelings
that Ministers met Parliament in January 1794, having no better news
to lay before the Houses than a tale of failure in all quarters. Pitt
had, at least, the consolation that a section of the Whigs, headed
by the Duke of Portland, in the same month announced to him their
intention of separating themselves from Fox, and of giving the Ministry
an independent support. It was, however, felt that such an arrangement
could neither be satisfactory nor of long continuance, since, as Sir
Gilbert Elliot put it, Portland’s party would be no more than “a
detached auxiliary force, to act on one occasion, to retire on another,
and to be a perpetual object of anxiety to those whom they meant to
serve, of hope to the enemy and of speculation to the rest of the
world.”[186] Moreover, there were members of it, most notably William
Windham, who were extremely dissatisfied with the military policy, or
want of policy, initiated by Dundas.[187] Negotiations were, therefore,
set on foot for the inclusion of Portland and some of his friends in
the Cabinet; and, after six full months spent in bargaining, it was
finally arranged, on the 11th of July 1794, that Portland should become
Second Secretary of State, Lord Fitzwilliam Lord President, and Lord
Spencer Lord Privy Seal, while Windham displaced the incompetent and
corrupt Sir George Yonge as Secretary at War. It may be well to add
at once that in December Lord Spencer exchanged the Privy Seal for
the Admiralty with the capable but indolent Lord Chatham, while Lord
Mansfield took over the Presidency of the Council, and Lord Fitzwilliam
accepted the Lord-Lieutenancy of Ireland.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account