British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
Then followed a miserable tragedy. Dundas, apparently before
the receipt of this letter, wrote on the 3rd of July to General
Diepenbrock, the Commandant at Nieuport, promising to send transports
for the embarkation of the garrison, if necessary, but adding that the
Government attached great importance to the retention of the place.
Within two days the French had broken ground before the miserable
little port, where the water was so shallow that ships could not
come near the shore; ◆July 16.◆ and less than a fortnight later
the unfortunate garrison, which included a few British troops, was
compelled to surrender. Forthwith the French massed the emigrants
in the ditch of the fort and played upon them with grape-shot until
the whole of them were destroyed. It was well known that this would
inevitably be the fate of those unhappy men if they fell into the hands
of the Republicans; and German authors have not hesitated to censure
the Duke of York because, according to the current, though unjust,
opinion, he neglected to order the evacuation of Nieuport while there
was yet time. It were, indeed, devoutly to be wished that the Duke
had respected Dundas less, and had withdrawn the garrison without
consulting him, though it is manifest that he would thereby have drawn
upon himself the censure of the Government. The blame, therefore, for
this shameful business must remain with Dundas; and it was a very great
misfortune for England that he was not called to account for it.[255]
Meanwhile the Duke continued his retreat northward down the river
Dendre, reaching Lombeek Ste. Catherine, about eight miles west of
Brussels, on the ◆July 5.◆ 4th of July. On the morrow the leaders of the
coalesced armies again met in conference at Waterloo, when it was
decided that Clerfaye’s force should pass eastwards towards Brussels,
and that the army of the Allies should ultimately occupy a line from
Antwerp, by Louvain, Wavre, and Gembloux, to Namur, but that until the
7th, at any rate, the line in advance of Brussels, extending from Alost
by Braine-le-Comte and Nivelles to Sombref, should be maintained. Ghent
had already been evacuated; and accordingly on the next day Clerfaye’s
force began its march to join Coburg, while Moira moved to Alost and
brought his troops for the first time under the Duke’s personal command.
◆July 6.◆ But Jourdan meanwhile was not inactive. On the 6th he attacked
the whole line of the Austrians from Braine-le-Comte to Gembloux; and,
though repulsed after hard fighting on the east, where a concentrated
attack might have given him possession of the Austrian line of
communications, he succeeded in pushing Coburg’s right wing back from
Braine-le-Comte and Nivelles to Waterloo. Thereupon Coburg warned the
Duke of York that he must retire eastward and cancel the agreement made
on the 5th. The Duke answered with cold sarcasm that it was a new thing
for the Austrians to retire before thirty thousand Frenchmen, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account