British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
The reader may have felt surprised that, with a force of nearly one
hundred and fifty thousand men, the French should not have pressed the
Allies harder, and made an end of them long before. The fact was that
the Committee of Public Safety had interfered with the Generals on the
4th of July, by an order that the recapture of Valenciennes, Condé,
Landrecies, and Quesnoy should take precedence of any further
operations; and accordingly the army in Belgium had been weakened to
provide for this service. This was the work of Robespierre, who at the
time was inclined towards peace; and indeed peace appears to have been a
common topic of conversation between the French and Austrian outposts
from the beginning of July.[257] Thirty thousand French soldiers were
accordingly withdrawn to Valenciennes, as many more were wasted in
occupying ports of embarkation for England, and the remainder were
ordered to push the Allies completely out of Belgium, and then to occupy
a cordon from Antwerp to Namur. ◆July 12.◆ Pichegru, therefore, took
command in person of the left wing, and on the 12th moved with eighteen
thousand men against Malines, while Jourdan on the right simultaneously
advanced against Louvain, Jodoigne, and Huy on the Meuse. On the evening
of the 12th Pichegru drove the Duke of York’s advanced posts into
Malines, where they were promptly reinforced; ◆July 15.◆ but the
fortifications of the town were in ruins, and, on renewing the attack on
the 15th, the French captured the place with little difficulty. The
troops charged with the defence were Hessians and Dutch; and it appears
certain that the conduct of one or the other of them was not
irreproachable, though there are indications also that the Duke himself
was partly responsible for the mishap.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account