British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
Five days later the British Cabinet at last decided to withdraw its
troops from the Continent, ◆March 11.◆ and on the 11th Harcourt, to his
infinite relief, received intimation that transports for twenty-three
thousand men were on their way to him. The Hanoverians were in
consternation over the danger to which Hanover was exposed by this
measure, but there was no help for it. ◆March 16.◆ A few days later
Prussian troops arrived to hold the line of the Ems, and on the 22nd the
British began their march to Bremen for embarkation. The Prussians did
their utmost by obstruction, discourtesy, and insolence to disoblige
them on their passage through the country; but this was natural, for
they had always professed contempt for the British as a nation of
traders, and a tradesman is never so despicable to a dishonest customer
as when he refuses to grant him further credit. ◆April 14.◆ Finally, on
the 14th of April, the infantry and part of the artillery took ship for
England, leaving the remainder of the artillery and the whole of the
cavalry behind them under Lord Cathcart and David Dundas. The number
embarked was nearly fifteen thousand, some proportion of the sick having
been recovered; so that the losses after the retreat from the Leck must
have amounted to about six thousand men, of which not a tithe were
killed or wounded in action. Thus disgracefully ended the first
expedition of Pitt and Dundas to the Low Countries.
AUTHORITIES.—The British despatches relating to the expeditions
to Flanders will be found in _W.O. Orig. Corresp._ 46–48, and in
Entry Book No. 11. The number of private letters included in this
collection makes it of unusual value. For the campaigns at large
the best accounts known to me are in Ditfurth’s _Die Hessen in den
Feldzügen, 1793, 1794, und 1795_ (Kassel, 1839), and in Witzleben’s
_Prinz Friedrich Josias von Coburg-Saalfeld_ (Berlin, 1859), which is
not a little built upon Ditfurth, but contains much that is valuable
of its own and a superb atlas of maps. On the French side the short
memoir of David and the life of Pichegru are of little worth compared
with the narrative of Jomini. Marshal Macdonald’s _Mémoires_ are
disappointing at this period. Of English printed accounts the most
important is Jones’s _Historical Journal of the British Campaign
in 1794_. The _Journal_ of Corporal James Brown of the Coldstream
Guards supplies a few interesting details. Sir H. Calvert’s _Journal
and Correspondence_ is often of value; and there is a great deal of
most useful information in the foot-notes to the miserable doggerel
called the _Narrative of an Officer of the Guards_. Unfortunately the
author, like Brown and Calvert, was a Coldstreamer, for which reason
all three confine themselves chiefly to the doings of the brigade of
Guards. The regimental histories of the 14th Foot and 15th Hussars
have occasionally interesting material, but, taken altogether, the
regimental records are disappointing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account