British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
[49] The force consisted of detachments of the 3rd and 4th Dragoons
(now Hussars), 12th, 29th, Hamilton’s, Dormer’s, Johnson’s, Moore’s,
Caulfield’s, Townsend’s, Wynne’s Foot.
[50] See, for instance, the commendations of Feuquières.
[51] 135 battalions, 260 squadrons.
[52] 122 battalions, 230 squadrons.
[53] These were, according to a contemporary plan (Fricx), the 16th,
18th, 21st, 23rd, 24th Foot.
[54] He is claimed as a Guardsman by General Hamilton (_Hist. Grenadier
Guards_), though Millner assigns him to the 16th Foot. This is the
only name of a man below the rank of a commissioned officer that I
have encountered in any of the books on the wars of Marlborough,
not excluding the works of Sergeants Deane and Millner. Littler was
deservedly rewarded with a commission.
[55] The Allied order of battle was peculiar. The artillery was all
drawn up in front, in rear of it came a first line of 100 squadrons,
then a second line of 80 squadrons, then a third line of 104
battalions, with wings of 14 squadrons more thrown out to the right and
left rear. _Daily Courant_, 6th September 1708.
[56] The five English regiments lost about 350 killed and wounded in
this assault. This would mean probably from a fifth to a sixth of their
numbers. _Daily Courant_, 6th September 1708.
[57] I have failed, in spite of much search, to identify the British
regiments present, excepting one battalion of the 1st Royals.
Marlborough, as Thackeray has reminded us by a famous scene in
_Esmond_, attributed the credit of the action in his first despatch
to Cadogan. Another letter, however, which appeared in the _Gazette_
three days later (23rd September), does full justice to Webb, as does
also a letter from the Duke to Lord Sunderland of 18th–29th September
(_Despatches_, vol. iv. p. 243). Webb’s own version of the affair
appeared in the _Gazette_ of 9th October, but does not mention the
regiments engaged. Webb became a celebrated bore with his stories of
Wynendale, but the story of his grievance against Marlborough would
have been forgotten but for Thackeray, who either ignored or was
unaware of the second despatch.
[58] Notably Prendergast’s. _Gazette_, 25th November.
[59] The British troops employed were the 6th Foot, 600 marines, and a
battalion of seamen.
[60] There are still some remains of the old walls of Tournay on the
south side of the town, and the ruins of Vauban’s citadel close by,
from which the extent of the works may be judged.
[61] The British regiments employed in the siege were the 1st Royals (2
battalions), 3rd Buffs, 37th, Temple’s, Evans’s and Prendergast’s Foot.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account