British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
Thus ended the battle of Malplaquet, one of the bloodiest ever fought
by mortal men. Little is known of the details of the fighting, these
being swallowed up in the shade of the forest of Taisnières, where
no man could see what was going forward. All that is certain is that
neither side gave quarter, and that the combat was not only fierce but
savage. The loss of the French was about twelve thousand men, and the
trophies taken from them, against which they could show trophies of
their own, were five hundred prisoners, fifty standards and colours and
sixteen guns. The loss of the Allies was not less than twenty thousand
men killed and wounded, due chiefly to the mad onset of the Prince of
Orange. The Dutch infantry out of thirty battalions lost eight thousand
men, or more than half of their number; the British out of twenty
battalions lost nineteen hundred men,[65] the heaviest sufferers being
the Coldstream Guards, Buffs, Orrery’s and Temple’s.[66]
The more closely the battle is studied, the more the conviction grows
that no action of Marlborough’s was fought less in accordance with his
own plans. We have seen that he would have preferred to fight it on
either of the two preceding days, and that he yielded to Eugene against
his own judgment in suffering it to be postponed. Then again there was
the almost criminal folly of the Prince of Orange, which upset all
preconcerted arrangements, threw away thousands of lives to no purpose,
and not only permitted the French to retreat unharmed at the close of
the day, but seriously imperilled the success of the action at its
beginning. Nevertheless there are still not wanting men to believe the
slanders of the contemptible faction then rising to power in England,
that Marlborough fought the battle from pure lust of slaughter.
Notwithstanding all blunders, which were none of Marlborough’s making,
Malplaquet was a very grand action. The French were equal in number to
the Allies, and occupied a position which was described at the time as
a fortified citadel. They were commanded by an able general, whom they
liked and trusted, they were in good heart, and they looked forward
confidently to victory. Yet they were driven back and obliged to leave
Mons to its fate; and though Villars with his usual bluster described
the victory as more disastrous than defeat, yet French officers could
not help asking themselves whether resistance to Marlborough and Eugene
were not hopeless. Luxemburg with seventy-five thousand men against
fifty thousand had only with difficulty succeeded in forcing the faulty
position of Landen; yet the French had failed to hold the far more
formidable lines of Malplaquet against an army no stronger than their
own. Say Villars what he might, and beyond all doubt he fought a fine
fight, the inference could not be encouraging to France.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account