British Flags: Their Early History, and Their Development at Sea: With an Account of the Origin of the Flag as a National DevicePerrin, William Gordon
History
British Flags: Their Early History, and Their Development at Sea: With an Account of the Origin of the Flag as a National Device
Perrin, William Gordon
Flags -- Great Britain
3. That (abroad) wheresoever more than 2 ships happen to be or
meet together the eldest Captain shall put up and wear a Pendant
of distinction and the other captains shall wear the Ordinary
Pendant.
4. That the said Pendant of distinction in this Fleet shall be
red with a large Cross at the head and double the breadth of the
ordinary Pendant, two thirds the length of it, and cut with a long
and narrow swallow tayle.
It was within the competence of Dartmouth to give such an order to the
squadron serving under him, but the practice seems to have been kept up
after he had left the Mediterranean, for Captain Sir Roger Strickland,
writing to Pepys from the Bay of Bulls in September, 1686, complained
Had I wore a Flag in this Expedition, I might then have had a sight
of Capt. Priestman's orders for his keeping the King's Ships under
his command so long here, at so extra an expence, & I am no less
surprised at his wearing a swallow-tail'd flag at his main topmast
head much broader than his ensign, having a St Andrew's Cross in
it as well as St George's, being indeed such a thing as I never
saw, seeming to turn the King's flag & Pend^t into ridicule when
at ye same time ye D. of Mortmar rides by him w^h only a small
Pend^t...[295].
From a "particular draft" of this pendant given to Pepys it appears
that it was very broad and short, with a red swallow-tailed fly, and a
blue saltire, surmounted by a red cross, on a white ground at the head.
Captain Priestman was brought to book and had to apologise to the king
for his action.
The practice of wearing a senior officers' pendant, although never
officially recognised, appears to have extended and to have been put
down by the following order issued in July, 1692:
Whereas we are informed that some of the Comanders of their Ma^{ts}
ships do take the liberty to wear Distinction Pendants without
any order for the same, contrary to the Rules of the Navy: We do
hereby strictly charge & require all Capt^{ns} & Comanders of
their Ma^{ts} Ships & Vessels & others hired into their service
That they do not presume upon any pretence whatsoever to wear any
other Pendants in the Ships they comand, then the Ordinary Pendants
w^h have by the constant practice of the Navy been worne in their
Ma^{ts} Ships of Warre without particular order in writing from
this Board for soe doeing[296].
After this we hear no more of this pendant until the great change
of 1864, when the following provision was made in the regulations
promulgated on that occasion:
When two or more of Her Majesty's Ships are present in Ports or
Roadsteads, a small Broad Pendant (White, with the St George's
Cross) is to be hoisted at the mizen-top-gallant-mast-head of the
Ship of the Senior Officer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account