British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
“It may be thought strange and unbeseeming to our sex to show ourselves
by way of petition to this Honourable Assembly. But the matter being
rightly considered of ... it will be found a duty commanded and
required. (1) Because Christ hath purchased us at as dear a rate as he
hath done men, and therefore requireth like obedience for the same mercy
as men. (2) Because in the free enjoying of Christ in His own laws, and
a flourishing estate of the Church and Commonwealth consisteth the
happiness of women as well as of men. (3) Because women are sharers in
the common calamities that accompany both Church and Commonwealth, when
oppression is exercised over the Church or Kingdom wherein they live;
and unlimited power given to the prelates to exercise authority over the
consciences of women as well as men: witness Newgate and Smithfield, and
other places of persecution, wherein women, as well as men, have felt
the smart of their fury,” etc.
“The petition was presented by Mrs. Anne Stagg, a gentlewoman and
brewer’s wife, and many others with her of like rank and quality. Mr.
Pym came to the Common’s door, addressed the women and told them that
their petition had been thankfully accepted and would be carefully
considered.”
Coke’s papers had been seized by the King at his death in 1634, but on
the 12th May, 1641, the House of Commons ordered Coke’s heir to print
them, and thus his views on this point were perpetuated.
On the 13th February, 1620, Coke had committed the House to
extraordinary doctrine in another relation to women. Among Mr. Lovell’s
witnesses was a lady, Mrs. Newdigate, “the House calling to have them
called in. Sir Edward Coke out of St. Barnard said, A woman ought not to
speak in the congregation. Examination hereof committed to a committee”
(_Commons Journal_). It is strange that Sir Edward Coke should have gone
so far afield as St. Barnard when St. Paul might have come in as
conveniently. Had he read the gospels as carefully as he had read St.
Barnard, he would have seen that one of the first two preachers of
Christ was Anna the prophetess, who spake of Him in the temple to all
them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem (Luke ii. 36), and that it
was through women that Christ sent the first message to the Apostles and
Disciples, that became the watchword of early Christianity, “Christ is
arisen” (Matthew xxviii., Luke xxiv., John xx.). Coke’s precedent on
this point was reversed in his own century.
On the 17th November, 1666, “Some debate arising whether Mrs. Bodville,
mother of Mrs. Roberts, should be admitted as witness, the matter being
debated in the House, the question being put whether Mrs. Bodville be
admitted, it was resolved in the affirmative, and Mrs. Bodville, with
several other witnesses was examined” (_Commons Journal_).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account