British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
Lodge and other writers doubt its genuineness. The author of the
“Dictionary of National Biography” gives as reasons for doubting it,
that Sir Joseph Williamson, to whom it was supposed to be addressed, was
not made Secretary of State until 1674; that Anne died in 1675, and that
there was no election between these dates; also, that it was not in the
style of her correspondence, and the signature was unusual, because she
always signed her titles in the order of creation—Pembroke, Dorset, and
Montgomery—and not in the order of her two marriages. None of the
critics, however, seem to have followed out the correspondence in the
Domestic Series of “State Papers” at the Public Record Office, which,
though it does not include the contested letter, yet illustrates it in a
remarkable manner.
The Parliament elected in 1661, 13 Charles II., has been called “The
Long or Pensionary Parliament,” lasting till 1678. (_See_ “Parl.
Returns,” vol. lxii., part i., p. 530.) John Lowther, Esq. of Hackthrop,
and John Dalston, Esq. of Accornbank, were Burgesses for Appleby. John
Lowther’s death necessitated a new election, and in January, 1667-8,
there was great excitement in and about Appleby. From Anne’s position as
High Sheriff of the County, she had the right to nominate a Candidate;
from her great goodness and bounty to the place, the Corporation were
willing to gratify her by electing whom she would. She determined to
have one of her grandsons the Tuftons, sons of her daughter, Countess
Thanet, four of whom were over 21, and in need of occupation. Failing
them, she meant to have selected her kinsman, Anthony Lowther. But
Joseph Williamson, Secretary to Lord Arlington, then Secretary of State,
had set his heart on that seat, and by all means in his power, open and
underhand, attempted to secure it. He was a native of those parts, and
had friends and relatives there, who all bestirred themselves in his
favour. Everybody “plied the Countess,” Williamson himself, his brother
and friends, the neighbouring gentry, the Justices of the Peace, the
Bishop of Winchester, Lord Arlington himself. Her replies at first were
very kindly, but they gradually became more and more “definite.”
Anne’s first letter, explaining how her interest was engaged, dated Jan.
16th, 1667-8, was addressed to “Mr. Secretary Williamson at Whitehall,”
showing that there is no weight in the argument as to Williamson’s
appointment not taking place till 1674, as being Under-Secretary, he
could be addressed so. Further, it is evident that the contested letter
was not addressed to Williamson, but to Lord Arlington, about
Williamson, though it may certainly have been re-addressed, and sent to
him later, and may have been found among his papers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account