British Quarterly Review, American Edition, Vol. LIII: January and April, 1871Various
History
British Quarterly Review, American Edition, Vol. LIII: January and April, 1871
Various
English periodicals
'do only serve for the solitary habitations of owls and
jackdaws; such are St. Daniel's, Castelhan, Kilvawyr,
Mountain, Capel Colman, and others in Pembrokeshire; Mount
Llechryd, in Cardiganshire; Aberllynog, in Breconshire;
Nelso, in Gower, Glamorganshire, and others in
Carmarthenshire. And it is not to be doubted, but as there
are districts of land, so there were originally just
endowment of tythes that did belong to all those several
churches; but whatever they were, they are now alienated,
the churches, most of them, demolished, the use for which
they were intended almost forgotten, unless it be at
Llanybrec, where, I am told, the improprietor or his tenant
has let that church unto the neighbouring Dissenters, who
are very free to rent it for the desirable opportunity and
pleasure of turning a church into a conventicle'--(pp. 23,
4.)
'As the Christian service is thus totally disused in some
places, there are other some that may be said to be but
half served, there being several churches where we are but
rarely, if at all, to meet with preaching, catechising, or
administering of the Holy Communion. In others, the service
of the prayers is but partly read, and that perhaps but
once a month, or once in a quarter of a year.... The
stipends are so small, that a poor curate must sometimes
submit to serve three or four churches for £10 or £12
a-year.'
He then refers, though with great forbearance and tenderness, to the low
type of character which such a state of things produced among the
clergy; and then exclaims, sorrowfully, 'Such is the faint shadow that
remains among us of the public service of religion!'
'And now,' continues the author, 'what Christian knowledge,
what sense of piety, what value for religion are we
reasonably to hope for in a country thus abandoned, and
either destitute of churches to go to, or of ministers to
supply them, or both? Or how can it well consist with
equity and conscience to complain of the ignorance and
errors of an unhappy people in such circumstances? They are
squeezed to the utmost to pay their tithes and what is
called the church dues (though, God knows, the Church is to
expect little from it), and, at the same time, most
miserably deprived of those benefits of religion which the
payment of them was intended to support, and delivered up
to ignorance and barbarity, which must be the certain
consequence of driving away the ministers of religion, or
of depressing or incapacitating them for their duty'--(p.
26.).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account