British Quarterly Review, American Edition, Vol. LIV: July and October, 1871Various
History
British Quarterly Review, American Edition, Vol. LIV: July and October, 1871
Various
English periodicals
'Where have I obtained this idea, which is so much above
me, which infinitely surpasses me, which astonishes me,
which makes me disappear in my own eyes, which renders the
infinite present to me. It is in me; it is more than
myself. It seems to me everything, and myself nothing. I
can neither efface, obscure, diminish, nor contradict it.
It is in me; I have not put it there, I have found it
there: and I have found it there only because it was
already there before I sought it. It remains there
invariable even if I do not think of it, when I think of
something else. I find it wherever I seek it, and it often
presents itself when I am not seeking it. It does not
depend upon me. I depend upon it.'[20]
Similarly Newman writes of conscience,--
'A voice within forbids, and summons us to refrain;
And if we bid it to be silent, it yet is not still: it is
not in our control,
It acts without our order, without our asking, against our will.
It is _in_ us, it belongs to us, but it is not _of_ us: it
is _above_ us.
It is moral, it is intelligent, it is not _we_, nor at our bidding;
It pervades mankind, as one life pervades the trees.'[21]
Whence then comes this law which is 'in us, yet not of us, but above
us,' which we did not create, and which circumstances do not fashion,
though they modify its action? Is it not the moral echo within of a
Voice louder and vaster without--a voice which legislates, and in its
sanctity commands, issuing imperial edicts for the entire universe of
moral agency? In one sense conscience is the viceroy or representative
of a higher power; in another it is the voice of one crying in the
wilderness of the human spirit, 'Prepare ye the way for the Law.' It
ever speaks 'as one having authority,' and yet its central
characteristic (as pointed out by a living teacher) is not that the
conscience _has_ authority, but that it is 'the consciousness _of_
authority.' It testifies to another: the implanted instinct bearing
witness to its Implanter; and through the hints and intimations of
this master-faculty thus throned amidst the other powers, we are able
to ascend intuitively and directly to God. We are 'constituted to
transcend ourselves,' and conscience becomes a ladder by which we
mount to the supernatural, as well as the voice inarticulate, yet
audible, which speaks to us of God. Thus, to quote the language of one
of the Cambridge Platonists of the 17th century (Dr. John Smith)--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account