Experiences, as understood in the vulgar sense, there are none
whatever. Our perceptions are purely token-values out of which
experiences may be derived in the same way that practical results may
be derived out of a sum of algebraical token-values by cancelling out
one against the other. Here must be borne in mind what was treated
of in our sixth Essay. With the perception “green” I get no positive
content of knowledge, but merely the fact “not-red, not-yellow,
not-blue,” and so forth.
At this point we are confronted by the so-called epistemological
problem, to the which, therefore, we now must devote some little
attention.
The question which forms the subject-matter of this problem is this:
How is it possible from bare perceptions, mere sense-impressions, ever
to arrive at conscious ideas, concepts, experiences?
This problem is associated above all with the name of Kant.
Starting with the idea that the sense-impressions received from
without, contain no element out of which experience, _i.e._ an inner
connection of individual impressions, could ever be developed, he
taught that in the subject there was contained a business capital, so
to speak, which, given _a priori_ to all experience, upon the occasion
of the activity of the organs of sense, came to fruition. This business
capital he called the given _a priori_ faculty of cognition.
The practical significance of this teaching lies not so much in itself
as in the fact that in contrast to it the position of the natural
sciences is formulated all the more clearly and distinctly: the passage
from bare perceptions to experience is of a purely empirical nature.
The erroneous features in such ideas find some support in certain
misunderstood physiological and pathological facts.
Physiology teaches that the human infant does not “see” but only
“looks,” _i.e._ he is the percipient of impressions from without in
virtue of the existence of sense organs, but he attaches no meaning
to these impressions. It is the same with the grown-up person after
certain lesions of the cerebral cortex, in animals from which the brain
has been artificially removed, and so forth. From this the conclusion
is drawn that bare perceptions may be transmuted into experiences and
that the condition of experience can again sink back into a condition
of bare perception.
Such ideas are supported by the teachings of many philosophers who
make the young living being to enter the world as a _tabula rasa_, so
to speak--as an empty pot which only now is to be filled with material
from this world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account