Where the whole _actual_ play of world-events is a summation of
self-sustaining processes, existence is action itself; and the simple
existence of an energical, of a Kammic system, purports that it makes
itself felt with regard to other systems of energies--sustains itself
in opposition to them. Actuality is devouring: man in his very nature
an eater.
Where there are a number of energical systems, they act against one
another. Where there is action, the corresponding reactions are present
in the shape of motions perceptible to sense.
These latter, here also, signify nothing save that energies are
present, and as such are at work according to circumstances and
antecedent conditions.
When two men, in wrestling with each other, fall into a whirling
movement, this by no means implies that there resides in these men
an energy of this particular variety; it means nothing more than
that energies are present, even as the circular movement of two
electro-magnets intimates nothing more than that energies are present.
Here also motion is only a by-product, the equivalent of the shadow in
the case of light--nothing in and of itself. When the flower unfolds
itself to the sun, when the creeper draws itself up towards the light,
when the caterpillar crawls along the leaf, when the wild geese cleave
the air like a wedge, when the dog snaps at the tit-bit, when I lift
my arm, lie down, get up, do this or the other thing--in each case it
is the same. All this only intimates that energies are present, and
in the course of their action against other systems of energies yield
by-products. In this mode of apprehending the fact “motion” as the
_shadow of energy_ the entire play of world-events, organic as well as
inorganic nature, the dead as the living, the re-actual as the actual,
admits of one uniform reading.
Secondly:--
In her fight against “telekinesis,” it is with science as with one who
in public discourses eloquently on enlightenment, but whose own house
is haunted by a ghost.
This hobgoblin of exact science is _gravitation_; and it bids fair
to scatter all exactitude to the winds, since the physicist, too, is
unable to represent it to himself otherwise than as acting independent
of time.
In the Buddha-thought this independence of time permits of being
“read” without the least difficulty, since here it is nothing but the
by-product which two systems of energies acting upon one another yield
with every alteration of energy-value on one side or the other. When I
shift the light with reference to the object illumined, the movement
of the shadow takes place as a by-product independent of time. In the
selfsame way, what we call gravitation is nothing but the by-product
independent of time which informs us that a change is taking place in
the energical relation of two world-systems.
Thirdly:--
The Buddha-thought furnishes a reading of the concept of time and space.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account