Buddhist birth stories; or, Jataka tales, Volume 1
Religion
Buddhist birth stories; or, Jataka tales, Volume 1
Jataka stories, English
[38] See the editions by _De Furia_, Florence, 1809; _Schneider_, in
an appendix to his edition of Æsop’s Fables, Breslau, 1812; _Berger_,
München, 1816; _Knoch_, Halle, 1835; and _Lewis_, Philolog. Museum,
1832, i. 280-304.
[39] _Bentley_, loc. cit.; _Tyrwhitt_, De Babrio, etc., Lond., 1776.
The editions of the newly-found MS. are by _Lachmann_, 1845; _Orelli_
and _Baiter_, 1845; _G. C. Lewis_, 1846; and _Schneidewin_, 1853.
[40] It was first edited by _Pithou_, in 1596; also by _Orelli_,
Zürich, 1831. Comp. _Oesterley_, ‘Phædrus und die Æsop. Fabel im
Mittelalter.’
[41] By _Silvestre de Sacy_, in his edition of Kalilah and Dimnah,
Paris, 1816; _Loiseleur Deslongchamps_, in his ‘Essai sur les Fables
Indiennes, et sur leur Introd. en Europe,’ Paris, 1838; Professor
_Benfey_, in his edition of the Pañca Tantra, Leipzig, 1859; Professor
_Max Müller_, ‘On the Migration of Fables,’ _Contemporary Review_,
July, 1870; Professor _Weber_, ‘Ueber den Zusammenhang indischer
Fabeln mit Griechischen,’ Indische Studien, iii. 337 and foll.; _Adolf
Wagener_, ‘Essai sur les rapports entre les apologues de l’Inde et de
la Grèce,’ 1853; _Otto Keller_, ‘Ueber die Geschichte der Griechischen
Fabeln,’ 1862.
[42] _J. Gilchrist_, ‘The Oriental Fabulist, or Polyglot Translations
of Æsop’s and other Ancient Fables from the English Language into
Hindustani, Persian, Arabic, Bhakka, Bongla, Sanscrit, etc., in the
Roman Character,’ Calcutta, 1803.
[43] Joasaph is in Arabic written also Yūdasatf; and this, through a
confusion between the Arabic letters _Y_ and _B_, is for Bodisat. See,
for the history of these changes, Reinaud, ‘Memoire sur l’Inde,’ 1849,
p. 91; quoted with approbation by Weber, ‘Indische Streifen,’ iii. 57.
[44] The Buddhist origin was first pointed out by Laboulaye in the
_Debats_, July, 1859; and more fully by Liebrecht, in the ‘Jahrbuch für
romanische und englische Literatur,’ 1860. See also Littré, _Journal
des Savans_, 1865, who fully discusses, and decides in favour of the
romance being really the work of St. John of Damascus. I hope, in a
future volume, to publish a complete analysis of St. John’s work;
pointing out the resemblances between it and the Buddhist lives of
Gotama, and giving parallel passages wherever the Greek adopts, not
only the Buddhist ideas, but also Buddhist expressions.
[45] _Pope Benedict XIV._ in ‘De servorum Dei beatificatione et
beatorum canonisatione,’ lib. i. cap. 45; _Regnier_, ‘De ecclesiâ
Christi,’ in Migne’s Theol. Curs. Compl. iv. 710.
[46] Decret. Greg., Lib. iii. Tit. xlvi., confirmed and explained by
decrees of Urban VIII. (13th March, 1625, and 5th July, 1634) and of
Alexander VII. (1659).
[47] p. 177 of the edition of 1873, bearing the official approval of
Pope Pius IX., or p. 803 of the Cologne edition of 1610.
[48] Cat. Sanct., Leyden ed. 1542, p. cliii.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account