[81] This is clear from vol. i. p. 410 of Mr. Fausböll’s text, where, at the end of the 100th tale, we find the words _Majjhima-paṇṇāsako nitthito_, that is, ‘End of the Middle Fifty.’ At the end of the 50th tale (p. 261) there is a corresponding entry, _Paṭhamo paṇṇōso_, ‘First Fifty’; and though there is no such entry at the end of the 150th tale, the expression ‘Middle Fifty’ shows that there must have been, at one time, such a division as is above stated. [82] See, for instance, above, p. xxvii; and below, p. 185. [83] ‘Pantscha Tantra,’ von _Theodor Benfey_, Leipzig, 1859, p. xi. [84] That is, in the course of Prof. Benfey’s researches. [85] In ‘Ersch und Grüber’s Encyklopædie,’ especially at pp. 255 and 277. [86] _Wassiliew_, ‘Der Buddhismus,’ etc., p. 68. [87] Compare the title of the Birth Story above, p. xxii, ‘A Lesson for Kings.’ [88] See above, p. xxix. [89] Knatchbull, p. 29. [90] _Dr. Fitz-Edward Hall’s_ Vāsavadatta, pp. 22-24. [91] _Dr. Bühler_ in the Indian Antiquary, i. 302, v. 29, vi. 269. [92] Nos. 61, 62, 63, 147, 159, 193, 196, 198, 199, 263. [93] Nos. 106, 145, 191, 286. [94] Nos. 58, 73, 142, 194, 220, and 277, have the same Introductory Story. And so Nos. 60, 104, 116, 161. And Nos. 127, 128, 138, 173, 175. [95] See the Pāli note at the end of Jātaka No. 91. [96] pp. 99-106. [97] Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 28, 29, 37, 55, 56, 68, 85, 87, 88, 97, 100, 114, 136 (total, eighteen in the Eka-Nipāta); 156 (=55, 56), 196, 202, 237 (=68), 241 (total, five in the Duka-Nipāta); 255, 256, 258, 264, 284, 291, 300 (total, seven in the Tika-Nipāta, and thirty altogether). [98] Nos. 152, 168, 179, 233, 286. [99] This belief underlies the curious note forming the last words of the Mahā-supina Jātaka, i. 345: “Those who held the Council after the death of the Blessed One placed the lines beginning _usabhā rukkhā_ in the Commentary, and then, making the other lines beginning _lābūni_ into one verse, they put (the Jātaka) into the Eka-Nipāta (the chapter including all those Jātakas which have only one verse).” [100] See, for instance, below, pp. 212, 228, 230, 317; above, p. xii; and Jātaka No. 113. [101] Nos. 110, 111, 112, 170, 199 in the Ummagga Jātaka, and No. 264 in the Suruci Jātaka. [102] No. 30 = No. 286. No. 34 = No. 216. No. 46 = No. 268. No. 57 = No. 224. No. 68 = No. 237. No. 86 = No. 290. No.102 = No. 217. No.145 = No. 198. [103] So No. 82 = No. 104. So No. 99 = No. 101. So No.134 = No. 135. So No.195 = No. 225. So No.294 = No. 295. Compare the two stories Nos. 23 and 24 translated below. [104] Translated below, pp. 278-290. [105] Billy (1535-1577) was Abbot of St. Michael’s, in Brittany. Another edition of his Latin version, by Rosweyd, is also reprinted in Migne, ‘Series Latina,’ tom. lxxiii; and several separate editions have appeared besides (Antwerp, 1602; Cologne, 1624, etc.).