When the Temple of Solomon was destroyed, with all the buildings that
surrounded it, the _debris_ would be piled up in the courts. Probably
it would never be thought worth while to remove it all from the lower
courts, but rather to cover it over and lay a neat pavement on the
surface. Spaces and corners where the rubbish was less gathered would
be filled in or built up to complete the levelling; and as the rubbish
increased, both within and without the walls, after successive sieges,
the walls themselves were further built up, to keep them of sufficient
height. It never was intended in the first instance, to build walls
up from the foundation and make them 150 feet high. By successive
changes, the result of calamities as much as the fruit of improvement,
the terraced mountain grew to be an elevated plateau, such as the
Haram enclosure is at the present day. Josephus says that when Herod
rebuilt the Temple he extended the area of the courts and made it twice
as large as it was before. With that, however, we need not concern
ourselves while we are seeking to restore the city of Old Testament
times.
_Solomon’s Palace_ we find reasons for placing south of Solomon’s
Temple, on the slope of the terraced mountain, with its south-eastern
angle coinciding with the present south-eastern corner of the Haram.
Those deep-buried stones with the Phœnician masons’ marks upon them
may be the very foundation stones of the palace. The palace was a
great work, and occupied thirteen years in building. It was necessary
to build up at this corner, but as soon as a level was reached that
permitted the work to be carried through from east to west, the
six-feet course was laid as the true base for the more splendid
superstructure. This six-feet course extends for 600 feet westward
from the south-east angle, and gives us the limit in that direction.
Northward we are limited by the courts of the temple to 300 feet. This,
then, is where Sir Charles Warren places Solomon’s palace, and these
are the dimensions he assigns to it. Mr James Fergusson had already
been led, from architectural reasons, to consider it an oblong of 550
feet by 300. The level of the six-feet course is 60 feet below the
summit of the mountain. A patient examination of the wall led Warren
to the conclusion that all below this great course is old work, and
that the walls of the Haram generally correspond to the description of
Josephus, in whose day the great wall of Solomon still existed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account