MESOPOTAMIA--“the Land between the Rivers”--is a tract of
country nearly 700 miles long, and from 20 to 250 miles broad, enclosed
between the Euphrates and the Tigris, and extending from the mountains
of Armenia to near the Persian Gulf. It is for the most part a vast
plain, but is crossed near its centre by a range of hills running
almost east and west-from Hit on the Euphrates, famous for its bitumen
pits, to Samarah on the Tigris. North of this line the country, though
dry and bare, is undulating, and rises occasionally into mountains,
while south of it the region is flat and consists of rich, moist,
alluvial land, formed by the rivers themselves. This land of alluvium
was Babylonia, and its capital Babylon; the country north of it was
Assyria, with its capital Nineveh. But the extent of both countries
varied from time to time, according to the power of various monarchs
and their successes in war.
The beginnings of the Assyrian and Babylonian empires are lost in
obscurity, and no records exist among the people themselves accounting
for their origin. Yet the account given in the Bible agrees so well
with what is known from the records that there can be no reasonable
doubt that in it there is a true history of the rise of these two
nations, which were in after time to wield the power of the then known
world. This Biblical account, borne out and amplified as it is by the
late discoveries, forms one of the most interesting and instructive
links in the history of the human race and its progress in civilisation.
“Taking, then, the account as it stands in the Bible,”[49] says Mr
Budge, “it appears that the descendants of Ham, the third son of Noah,
were Cush, Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan. The lands of Cush and Mizraim
have hitherto been identified with Ethiopia and Egypt respectively;
Phut was regarded as doubtful, and Canaan was the country with which
we are so well acquainted from the frequent occurrence of the name in
the Bible. The identification of the first-named and most important
of these districts, the land of Cush, has been regarded by many as
unsatisfactory: for Nimrod, judging from the names of towns said to
have been founded by him, could hardly have been an Ethiopian, though,
according to the Bible story, he was a descendant of Cush.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account