rock represents a line of nine persons united by a cord tied round
their necks, and having their hands bound behind their backs, who are
approaching another of more majestic stature, who, holding up his right
hand in token of authority, treads on a prostrate body. His countenance
expresses the idea of a great king or conqueror, and behind the king
stand two guards with long spears in their hands.
The reign of Darius was disturbed by many revolts, and the
insurrectionary attempts of many impostors and pretenders. It is these
impostors who are represented as prisoners in the sculpture, and over
the head of each figure we find his name and description. The first
one, the prostrate figure, is “Gomates, the Magian, an impostor,” who
said, “I am Bartius, the son of Cyrus; I am the King,” and so on. The
inscription is by far the largest and most important record which has
been preserved of the greatness of Darius, and of the Persian state and
system. The lines over the monarch himself would read in English as
follows:--
“I am Darius the king, the great king, the king of kings, the king of
Persia, the king of the (dependent) provinces, the son of Hystaspes,
the grandson of Arsames, the Achæmenian,” &c.
It will be noticed here how the word king is repeated; as the
inscription proceeds the name Darius is repeated also. A German
scholar, Professor Grotefend, had observed that such inscriptions
generally begin with three or four words, one of which varies while
the others do not. He suspected that the word which changes would be
the king’s name--as different inscriptions would relate to different
kings--and that the other words gave the king’s titles. He felt
convinced that a word which was constantly repeated signified “king,”
and conjectured that when two kings were mentioned they were probably
father and son. Finding that the names of Cyrus and Cambyses would
not suit, because no two names in the inscription he was dealing with
commenced with the same letter, he tried others. Cyrus and Artaxerxes
seemed equally inapplicable, because of their unequal length, the
two names he was dealing with being of six letters each. The only
names remaining were those of Darius and Xerxes; and these on further
comparison appeared to agree so exactly with the characters that he
did not hesitate at once to adopt them. Having thus found out more
than twelve letters, among which were precisely those composing the
royal title, the next business was to give these names their original
Persian form, in order that by ascertaining the correct value of each
character, the royal title might be deciphered. From the “Zendavesta”
of Anquetil du Perron, M. Grotefend found that the Greek form Hystaspes
was originally represented in Persian by Gustasp, Kishtasp, or
Wistasp. The first seven letters of this name were at once discovered,
while a comparison of all the royal titles led him to the conclusion
that the three last formed the inflection of the genitive singular,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account