Burmah and the BurmeseMackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
History
Burmah and the Burmese
Mackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
Burma -- Civilization; Burma -- History
No time was now lost in advancing upon the retreating army. On the 9th of
December the march of the British columns began, and their path lay along
“dismal swamps,” and jungles, which, overrun with every kind of reeds and
elephant-grass, presented a dreary and dispiriting aspect to the troops.
Indeed, the effect of the marshy country was soon felt on the army, for
on the 12th the cholera broke out among the troops, and, according to
Lieutenant-Colonel Tulloch,[318] nearly two regiments were placed in an
unfit condition for action. At Meaday the sight was sad enough. “Within
and among the stockades,” says Mac Farlane,[319] “the ground was strewed
with dead and dying Burmese lying promiscuously together, the victims of
wounds, of disease, or of want. Several large gibbets stood about the
stockade, each bearing the mouldering remains of three or four crucified
Burmese, who had been thus barbarously put to death for having wandered
from their posts in search of food, or for having followed the example of
their chiefs in flying from the enemy.”[320]
I must pass briefly over subsequent events. Conferences for the purpose
of settling a peace were sought and obtained by the Burmese; but the
negotiations came to nothing. It seemed that all feelings of any kind
had left them. They neither sought to conclude a peace, nor, on the
other hand, did they prepare for contesting the advance of the army on
the capital. At last, after much deliberation and little determination,
a treaty of peace was concluded by commissioners appointed for that
purpose, through the intervention of a priest. However, after all, it
never reached the king for his ratification. “During the conferences,”
however, “the Burman commissioners repeatedly declared their being
furnished with full powers, and their firm persuasion, that whatever
they agreed to, the king would ratify; they expressed their entire
satisfaction with the spirit in which the negotiations had been conducted
by the British commissioners, and their gratification at the prospect
of a speedy renewal of friendly relations; they made no secret of their
motives, and frankly and unreservedly admitted that the king had been
ruined by the war, that the resources of the country were exhausted, and
that the road to Ava was open to the British army. There appears every
reason to credit their assertions, and all who had an opportunity of
exercising personal observation were impressed with this conviction, that
the negotiators were honest.”[321] I cannot, however, but point out to
the reader that there appears to be a singular dash of cunning in their
confessions. The king was ruined, at least so they said; thus it was
useless ever to require money for expenses. Otherwise, there seems to be
simplicity enough.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account