By Neva's waters : $b Being an episode in the secret history of Alexander the First, Czar of all the RussiasCarling, John R.
History
By Neva's waters : $b Being an episode in the secret history of Alexander the First, Czar of all the Russias
Carling, John R.
Napoleonic Wars, 1800-1815 -- Campaigns -- Russia -- Fiction; Russia -- History -- Alexander I, 1801-1825 -- Fiction
And now that the deed was over their courage fell again, and they stared
at one another in a sort of stupor. There would be a tribunal to face,
namely, the nation, and what would it say to this deed of darkness?
Benningsen still maintained his hardihood, at least outwardly.
“Who’d have thought the little ape had so much life in him?” he sneered,
looking down upon the body. “We have damaged him a little. But some paint
and the doctor’s art will soon make him presentable to the public. You
are all witnesses that he died of apoplexy.”
As they stole from the dimly-lighted chamber leaving Ouvaroff to awaken
beside the body of his murdered Sire, they caught the faint moaning of
the prostrate Voronetz.
“A lad of brave spirit!” commented Benningsen. “’Tis a pity he should
die. We’ll send Dr. Wylie to him to see whether he can be mended. But
he’ll have to hold his peace.”
Making their way to another quarter of the now alarmed palace the
ministers sought the chamber where the two Grand Dukes, Alexander
and Constantine, were confined—under sentence of death, so it was
believed—and setting the two brothers free gave them an account of their
father’s _execution_, seeking to pacify their grief and indignation
by the argument, doubtless a true one, that since Paul would not sign
the abdication, no alternative was left but killing. For let them but
retire from his bed-chamber, and Paul would at once have called upon his
guard to slaughter them; and, having now learned that his two sons were
parties to the conspiracy, he would doubtless have included them in the
slaughter. It was Alexander’s death or Paul’s, and they chose it should
be Paul’s.
“And thus,” said the Duchess, concluding her story, “thus did Paul die.
His body lies in state in St. George’s Hall. A solemn mass is chanted
twice a day—and twice a day the murderers bend in prayer beside the bier!
The mockery of it! Does God sleep that such things can be?”
The Duchess’s narration, correct in the main, as the historian can
testify, set Wilfrid’s nerves a-quivering with a variety of emotions.
Horror was followed by indignation, and indignation by loathing. The deed
itself was black enough in all conscience, but blacker still were the
cowardice, the hypocrisy, the lying employed to conceal it.
“In England,” he remarked, “these assassins would be swinging. In Russia
they are ministers. Truly, Alexander the Amiable merits his name. He _is_
amiable—very—towards his fathers’ murderers!”
The Duchess seemed to resent this disparagement of Alexander.
“Consider his position,” she answered. “Is he to begin his reign by
degrading the men who have put him on the throne? They who slew one Czar
may slay another.”
“And can a man die better than in the attempt to avenge his father’s
murder? If fear of the assassin’s dagger keeps Alexander from doing an
act of justice then have the Russians a Czar, but scarcely a hero.”
“You are bold, sir, in the absence of Alexander.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account