Hebrew literature -- History and criticism; Jewish literature -- History and criticism; Jews in literature
Now Herder’s treatment of ancient literature rendered a lasting service
despite his fundamental misconception. What James Sully calls Herder’s
“excessive and sentimental interest in primitive human culture”
prepared the way for the “genetic” theories of our time. He thoroughly
realized the natural element in national poetry. He explained genius in
terms of race. To him is due some part of the conception of a “Jewish
culture,” as formulated by present-day Zionists of Ahad ha-‘Am’s
school. It is rather curious that while, on the one hand, Herder’s
theories helped national anti-Semitism, on the other hand, they gave
suggestions to national Judaism. By laying undue stress on the natural,
Herder exaggerated the national in the human spirit. In his early
manhood Herder had thought of training as a physician. But he abandoned
the idea because he could not endure the dissecting-room. When he came
to discuss the world’s genius he used the scalpel freely enough. His
gorge rose against cutting up the body, but he felt no reluctance to
dissect the spirit.
Earlier writers had overlooked the national element in the Bible.
Herder saw in the Old Testament nothing but national songs. The thought
often led him right. He strongly opposed, for instance, the mystic and
allegorical interpretations of the Song of Songs. To him it was a love
poem, the purest, most delicate love poem of antiquity (“den reinsten
und zartesten Liebesdichtung des Altertums”). Hebrew literature was
national, but it revealed its nationality under unique conditions, for
it was marked by the “poetic consciousness of God.” In all this Herder
was magnificently right. But he could not leave well alone. In one
of his latest essays he summed up the Hebrew poetry as distinguished
indeed by religiosity, but also by simplicity (“kindliche Naivetä,
Religiosität, Einfalt”). No term could be worse chosen. Hebrew poetry
shows consummate art. If it conveys the sense of simplicity, it is
because the poet’s art so thoroughly conceals its workings. Herder made
aesthetically the same mistake as Wellhausen perpetrated theologically.
According to Wellhausen, the prophets of the eighth century before
the Christian era suddenly appeared as an utterly new phenomenon on
the Hebraic horizon, whereas, in truth, by the time we reach Amos we
have got to a very advanced stage in the religious history of Israel.
So, too, is it with the biblical poetry. It is, even in its earliest
fragments, such as the Song of Deborah, a highly cultivated form.
“Simplicity” is the last word to apply to it. It is powerful, it is
sincere, but it is not naive. The Greek athlete who conquered at the
Olympic games was robust, but he had gone through a long process of
training. Vigor is not synonymous with artlessness. Trench wrote a
charming book on the “use of words.” An equally entertaining book
could be compiled on the “misuse of words.” In such a book, a front
place would be assignable to Herder’s “simplicity.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account