By-ways on Service: Notes from an Australian JournalDinning, Hector
History
By-ways on Service: Notes from an Australian Journal
Dinning, Hector
World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives, Australian
Three days in Rouen left one with the knowledge that it is dangerous
to transport suddenly a body of Australians, after eighteen months'
residence on Anzac and in Egypt, to a land where the wine is cheap and
every girl is pretty.
CHAPTER II
BILLETED
The natural course was to advertise. The _Journal de Rouen_ received
us tolerantly, even compassionately. No one of us could speak French,
but one pretty member of the office staff (more accurately, one member
of the pretty office staff) could speak a kind of English. The first
demand was for a _petite annonce_ in French. And when the lady saw this
was out of the question for us, she offered a translation of an English
paragraph.
It brought a shoal of responses in French. A kind of horse-sense
had led us to get them addressed "to this office," where the fair
translator could be requisitioned. They were seductive replies--in
the inevitable language of proprietresses. Some offered rooms and
meals; some rooms and breakfast; some rooms and no more; others
specified a _femme de chambre_ of the first quality (and these were
looked at twice). None offered a bath. This is the most extraordinary
country. It drives you to the conclusion, anyhow, that a bathroom is
necessary neither to health nor good looks, and thereby runs counter
to a long-established English prejudice. A bathroom is by no means a
necessary part of the furniture of a good hotel. Those that have been
driven by the English occupation into adding one, brag about it in
their advertisements and charge "a franc a time." Those that steadily
decline to add it are losing custom.
The conclusion of the matter was we yielded to none of their
blandishments, but went to an hotel, and that for good reasons. They
resolve themselves into a question of feeding--_i.e._, of meal-hours.
You go into lodgings in a flat, and of necessity there are more or less
definitely limited periods for meals. This is killing, even when not
regarded in the light of irregular working hours. To be tied to 8 for
breakfast, 1 for lunch, and 6 for dinner, is to be in gaol. The chief
beauty of an hotel is that you may have breakfast from 6.30 to 10,
lunch from 12 to 2.30, and dinner from 6 to 9.30. This leaves you, to
some extent, at freedom with the leisure an exacting Headquarters does
sometimes throw to you.
Breakfast is altogether French. You'll get no more than _café au lait_
and roll--not even _confiture_, without paying through the nose for
this violation of French usage. If you order eggs or _omelette_ (or
both) you not only wait long for it, but are looked on with disfavour
even in a first-class establishment. But the coffee is so rich and
mellow and the roll so crisp and the butter so creamy that you can make
a large meal of them. You usually eat and drink far more than it's good
form to consume. He's a barbarian who asks for anything better.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account