Byzantine Churches in Constantinople: Their History and ArchitectureVan Millingen, Alexander
Philosophy
Byzantine Churches in Constantinople: Their History and Architecture
Van Millingen, Alexander
Architecture, Byzantine; Church architecture -- Turkey -- Istanbul; Church buildings -- Turkey -- Istanbul
What information we have in regard to the chapel is little, but clear
and definite, resting as it does on the authority of the two epitaphs
which the poet Philes composed to be inscribed on the interior and
exterior walls of the building. One of the epitaphs, if ever placed in
position, has been destroyed or lies concealed under Turkish plaster. Of
the other only fragments remain, forming part of the scheme of
decoration which adorns the south wall of the chapel. But fortunately
the complete text of both epitaphs is preserved in the extant writings
of their author, and affords all the information they were meant to
record. The chapel was dedicated to Christ as the Logos[249] and was
built after the death of the protostrator by his wife Maria, or Martha
in religion, for a mausoleum in which to place his tomb.[250] As the
protostrator died about 1315, the chapel was erected soon after that
date. An interesting incident occurred in this chapel soon after the
Turkish conquest. One day when the Sultan was riding through his newly
acquired capital he came to the Pammakaristos, and upon being informed
that it was the church assigned to the Patriarch Gennadius, alighted to
honour the prelate with a visit. The meeting took place in this
parecclesion, and the conversation, of which a summary account was
afterwards sent to the Sultan, dwelt on the dogmas of the Christian
Faith.[251]
[Illustration: FIG. 49.]
The text of the epitaph, portions of which appear on
the exterior face of the south wall of the parecclesion of
the church of the Pammakaristos (_Carmina Philae_, ccxxiii.
ed. Miller, vol. i. pp. 117-18) reads as follows:--
[Greek: Aner, to phôs, to pneuma, to prosphthegma mou,
kai touto soi to dôron ek tês syzygou;
sy men gar hôs agrypnos en machais leôn
hypnois, hypelthôn anti lochmês ton taphon;
egô de soi teteucha petraian stegên, 5
mê palin heurôn ho stratos se syncheê,
kan deuro ton choun ektinaxas ekrybês,
ê tou pachous rheusantos hêrpagês anô,
pan hoplon apheis ekkremes tô pattalô;
tas gar epi gês ebdelyxô pastadas 10
en eutelei tribôni phygôn bion
kai pros noêtous antetaxô satrapas,
sterrhan metendys ek theou panteuchian.
hôs ostreon goun organô soi ton taphon,
ê kochlon ê kalyka kentrôdous batou; 15
margare mou, porphyra, gês allês rhodon,
ei kai trygêthen ekpiezê tois lithois
hôs kai stalagmous proxenein moi dakryôn,
autos de kai zôn kai Theon zônta blepôn
hôs nous katharos tôn pathôn tôn ex hylês 20
ton son palin thalamon eutrepize moi;
hê syzygos prin tauta soi Martha graphei,
prôtostrator kalliste kai tethammenôn].[252]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account