Byzantine Churches in Constantinople: Their History and ArchitectureVan Millingen, Alexander
Philosophy
Byzantine Churches in Constantinople: Their History and Architecture
Van Millingen, Alexander
Architecture, Byzantine; Church architecture -- Turkey -- Istanbul; Church buildings -- Turkey -- Istanbul
building are framed in marble jambs and lintels, adorned in most cases
with a running ornament and crosses. In the case of the doors of the
exonarthex a red marble, _brèche rouge_, is employed, as in the
exonarthex of the Pantokrator, another erection of the Comnenian period.
On the exterior the building is much damaged, but nevertheless preserves
traces of considerable elaboration. The walls are of brick, intermixed
with courses of stone, and on the three sides of the central apse there
are remains of patterned brickwork. On the buttresses to the southern
wall are roundels with radiating voussoirs in stone and brick, and if
one may judge from the fact that the string-course does not fit the face
of the wall, parts of the exterior of the church were incrusted with
marble. The round-headed windows of the dome cut into its cornice. Under
the church is a cistern[355] which Bondelmontius deemed worthy of
mention.[356] Until some twenty years ago extensive substructures were
visible on the north-east of the church, affording homes for poor Greek
families.[357] They were probably the foundations of the lofty monastery
buildings whose windows commanded the magnificent view of the Golden
Horn that doubtless suggested the epithet Pantepoptes, under which the
Saviour was worshipped in this sanctuary.
[Illustration: PLATE LVIII.
S. SAVIOUR PANTEPOPTES. EXTERIOR DECORATION IN BRICK, ON
SOUTH SIDE.]
[Illustration: S. MARY PAMMAKARISTOS. BRACKET AT THE SOUTH-EAST ANGLE OF
THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE PARECCLESION.]
_To face page 214._
S. Saviour Pantepoptes is the most carefully built of the later churches
of Constantinople. The little irregularities of setting out so common in
the other churches of the city are here almost entirely absent. This
accuracy of building, the carving of the string-courses, and the remains
of marble decoration both within and on the exterior, prove exceptional
care.
For details see Figs. 68, 72, 75.
[Illustration: FIG. 73.]
[Illustration: FIG. 74.]
[347] Patr. Constantius, pp. 70-80.
[348] Nicet. Chon. p. 752.
[349] Glycas, p. 622.
[350] _Ibid._ For the career of this distinguished woman, see Diehl,
_Figures byzantines_.
[351] Nicet. Chon. pp. 315-16; Pachym. i. pp. 314-15, ii. p. 185.
[352] Villehardouin, _La Conquête de C.P._ pp. 141-44; _Chroniques
gréco-romaines_, pp. 96, 97.
[353] Riant, _Exuviae sacrae_, p. 178.
[354] Paspates, p. 314.
[355] _Die byzantinischen Wasserbehälter von K.P._, von Dr. P.
Forcheimer und Dr. J. Strzygowski, pp. 106-7.
[356] _Librum insularum Archipelagi_, 65.
[357] Paspates, p. 314.
CHAPTER XV
THE CHURCH OF S. SAVIOUR PANTOKRATOR,
ZEÏREK KILISSI JAMISSI
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account