Cambridge (England) -- Pictorial works; University of Cambridge -- Pictorial works
[68] The importance of Cambridge was steadily growing in the reigns
of Henry I. and Stephen. The isle of Ely supported Matilda; and the
earldom of Cambridge was conferred both by her and by Stephen for the
first time. The former by her letters, issued before the year 1146,
bestowed it on her favourite Aubrey de Vere, “if the King of Scotland
hath it not,” as prior in dignity to the counties of “Oxfordshire,
Berkshire, Wiltshire, or Dorsetshire” one of which he was to take if
Stephen’s gift of the earldom of Cambridge to Saint David of Scotland
held good. De Vere had to accept the county of Oxford which has since
remained in that family--the earldom of Cambridge passing to royal
hands and becoming in time a royal dukedom. David of Scotland held
Cambridge in his own and Huntingdon in right of his wife. Malcolm of
Scotland held both earldoms together in exchange for the northern
counties of Northumberland and Cumberland. The union of these earldoms
is still represented by the union of Huntingdon and Cambridge under
one _vicecomes_ or sheriff. Edward III. created his wife’s brother
(the Count of Hainault) and after him his son Edmund Langley, earls of
Cambridge. Edmund’s son Richard held the earldom until his attainder,
and his son Richard Duke of York was again created Earl of Cambridge
by Henry V. (p. 295). This was Edward IV.’s father in whom the earldom
became merged in the crown. The arms of Edmund Langley, Duke of York
and Earl of Cambridge, are on the first of the 6 shields of arms of
Edward’s sons over the entrance gate of Trinity; beneath is inscribed:
EDMONDUS D. EBOR. C. CANTABRUGIE.
[69] See “Town and Gown” chap. iv. p. 233 _n._
[70] Cf. “the students from regions near home” (_e partibus diversis
tam cismarinis_ ...) of his father’s rescript p. 33.
[71] For other references to this important document see _ante_ pp.
14, 28; chap. iii. p. 165 _n_, iv. p. 203.
[72] Henry VI., VII., VIII., and Edward VI. continued the favour shown
by the Henrys and Edwards to Cambridge; the exceptions were Henry V.
and Edward IV. See ii. p. 101, v. p. 262. For the relation of the
English queens to the university see Queens’ College pp. 109, 112, and
p. 114.
Edward III. allowed the university to appropriate any church of the
yearly value of £40; to receive (through its chancellor) the oaths
of the mayor and aldermen and the bailiffs; to take cognizance of
all causes in which the scholars were concerned, “maim and felony”
excepted; and required that the chancellor should not be disquieted if
he imprisoned offenders; that masters of arts should not be cited out
of the university; and that the mayor should make assay of the weight
of bread as often as the chancellor demanded it.
[73] pp. 29, 54.
[74] Peterhouse p. 55, S. John’s pp. 122-3.
[75] Except Kilkenny’s exhibitioners, _infra_ p. 40.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account