Cambridge (England) -- Pictorial works; University of Cambridge -- Pictorial works
[340] Colleges were not at first built for the ‘undergraduate.’ The
scholar of the xiii, xiv, and xv centuries was the _socius_ (fellow)
of to-day. His clerical position was that of a young man in minor
orders, his scholastic that of a bachelor in art. He attended the
schools of the doctors and masters, and was assisted by his fellowship
and by exhibitions in the learned faculties to study for the degrees
(master of art, and doctor in the faculties). The pensioner, who
might or might not be an undergraduate in standing and who lived at
his own charges, was provided for in the hostel. It was not till the
visitation of 1401 that we find _socii_ and _scholares_ distinguished;
and when King’s College was founded in the same half century its
scholars were young students and nothing else. Nevertheless,
although such was the original conception of the endowed college--at
Peterhouse, Michaelhouse, Pembroke, Corpus--the later developments
were outlined from the first. The bible clerks at Peterhouse were
poor students not of the standing of bachelors, and a proviso in the
statutes enabled the college to maintain “2 or 3 indigent scholars
well grounded in grammar” when its funds shall permit. At Clare (1359)
the sizar was regularly recognised. At Pembroke (1347) there were in
addition to the “major scholars” 6 “minor scholars” who might fit
themselves to be major scholars. At King’s Hall (Statutes Ric. II.)
boys from 14 years old were admitted. At Christ’s (1505) the standing
of the scholar was defined by requiring him to give instruction in
sophistry; but the pensioner was contemplated for the first time as
a regular inmate of the college. In fact the _perendinant_ who ate
at the college tables became, before the middle of the xv c., the
_commensalis_; the class being fully recognised 50 years later in the
_convivae_ of Christ’s. There were no fewer than 778 _convivae_ or
pensioners in the colleges in the time of Caius 1574.
As to the age at which youths went up, it was not until the xix c.
that the university was finally regarded as the complement to a full
‘college’ (public school) course elsewhere. The grammar boys at Clare
and Peterhouse, the richer youths at King’s Hall, and the glomery
students, must always have kept Cambridge peopled with little lads:
but when grammar disappeared altogether (in the xvi c.) from the
university curriculum, scholars continued to go up very young. In the
xvi c. Wyatt went to S. John’s at 12, Bacon and his elder brother to
Trinity at 12 and 14; Spenser was in his 16th year. In the xvii c.
George Herbert was 15, so was Andrew Marvell, Milton had not attained
his 15th year; Newton went to Trinity at 17, and Herschell to S.
John’s at the same age. Pitt was a precocious exception in the xviii
c. at 14.
All the scholars of the early colleges were to be indigent; the one
exception was King’s Hall, but the proviso appears again in the
statutes for King’s College.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account