Canada -- History -- 1763-1867; Canada -- History -- To 1763 (New France)
"We have no chance," they said; "we are abandoned and our men losing
heart; let us capitulate while we can." They spoke so strongly, that
Mascarene allowed three of them to confer with the French commander
and obtain his proffered terms in writing. But no sooner had he cast
his eye over the paper than Mascarene steadfastly refused to sign.
In vain his officers implored him to put his name to the deed of
surrender. He rebuked them and set about with tact and energy to
raise the spirits of his men and reanimate them with courage. The
French renewed their attack on the fort. Day after day and night
after night they tried to wear out the garrison, but Mascarene had
now, by his patience and good spirits, brought all to his way of
thinking. Try as they would, the French could make no impression on
the sturdy ramparts of Annapolis.
Duvivier sickened of the siege, and during October returned to
Louisburg. No sooner had he gone than the French Acadians were
filled with fear. They had supposed that all Acadia would have been
won for King Louis, and, realising their mistake, they {171} hastened
to send deputies to Mascarene declaring that they had refused to take
any part in the expedition. At the same time they wrote to the
defeated French commander to say, "We live under a mild and tranquil
government, and we have good reason to be faithful to it. We hope,
therefore, that you will not separate us from it, and that you will
grant us the favour not to plunge us into utter misery."
Soon I will have to tell you how these same Acadians, because of
their continued treachery to the English Government, had to be
transported from this land of their birth or adoption. A great deal
has been written about the poor Acadians to excite our sympathy for
them at the fate which shortly awaited them. You will see that they
brought it upon themselves, or rather that their leaders and
ill-advisers brought it upon them. Perfectly happy and contented
were they under English rule, but base priests and agitators amongst
them tried hard to instil into their minds the idea of a grievance
and stirred up treachery and disaffection in their hearts. Bitterest
and most unscrupulous of these agitators was a priest named Le
Loutre. Although an able man, he was a terrible coward, and shrank
from no crime, no falsehood, to gain his ends. Of Le Loutre and the
results of his policy we will speak hereafter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account