Canada: Its Postage Stamps and Postal StationeryHowes, Clifton A. (Clifton Armstrong)
History
Canada: Its Postage Stamps and Postal Stationery
Howes, Clifton A. (Clifton Armstrong)
Postage stamps -- Canada; Postal stationery -- Canada
Postmasters of _Non-Accounting_ Offices are particularly asked to
bear in mind that any 3c. letter-cards, 3c. stamped envelopes or 3c.
postage stamps which conformably to this instruction, they may
receive from the public in exchange for other stamps and find
unsaleable, _must be returned, as above directed, to the City Post
Offices from which they respectively obtain their supplies_, and not
to the Department.
_As only the unused remnant of 3c. stamps now in the Department will
be surcharged_, Postmasters must not send in, with a view to their
surcharge, any 3c. stamps in their possession nor accept 3c. stamps
from the public for that purpose.
Postmasters must distinctly understand that the exchange of stamps
herein permitted applies _only_ to the 3c. letter-card, the 3c.
stamped envelope and 3c postage stamp.
R. M. COULTER,
_Deputy Postmaster General_.
As a matter of fact the 2 cent purple seems to have lasted about a week
longer than was anticipated in the above circular, so that the
surcharged 3 cent stamps were not issued until the 28th July.[152] A
correspondent of the _Weekly Philatelic Era_, in its issue for 22nd
July, said: "I learn that the 3c numeral and some 3c with the four maple
leaves will be surcharged," which proved correct; those first issued on
the date mentioned above were of the numeral type, while on the 8th
August[153] the "maple leaf" 3 cent made its appearance with the same
surcharge.
[152] =Monthly Journal=, X: 35.
[153] =Mekeel's Weekly Stamp News=, XIII: 308.
Illustrations of the two stamps will be found as numbers 41 and 42 on
Plate II. It is stated that the surcharge was made up in its peculiar
form so as to prevent counterfeiting by the use of ordinary type. At any
rate the graded height of the numeral and letters, giving the concave
effect to the top of the surcharge, shows it to have been specially
prepared. There is some variation in the thickness of the surcharge, due
perhaps to inking and to wearing of the plates. The overprinting was
done in full sheets of one hundred from a special plate, in black ink,
and should normally be horizontally across the bottom of the stamps.
Poor registering of the sheets in printing caused the position to vary
even up to about the middle of the stamp in some cases, and of course
there had to be some inverted surcharges in both varieties. The number
of these has not been published. Illustrations of the inverts will be
found as numbers 44 and 45 on Plate II.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account