Canada: Its Postage Stamps and Postal StationeryHowes, Clifton A. (Clifton Armstrong)
History
Canada: Its Postage Stamps and Postal Stationery
Howes, Clifton A. (Clifton Armstrong)
Postage stamps -- Canada; Postal stationery -- Canada
I will now proceed to prove the absurdity of the manipulation
described in the article referred to by facts and figures: The space
between the stamp and the points of the ribbon bearing the
inscription "Canada Post Card" on the correct issue, where the cards
would have to be cut to manufacture Canadensis' error (?) cards, is
4 millimeters. If this space is equally divided in cutting the
sheet, it would leave a margin to the left of the stamp and to the
right of the ribbon, after being cut, of 2 millimeters, while the
space between the right side of the stamp and the ribbon would be 10
millimeters.
Now take an error card, and you will find the latter space to
measure only 3 millimeters, and the outer margin to the left of the
stamp and the right of the ribbon to be respectively 5 millimeters.
"Figures do not lie".
A. Lohmeyer.
Baltimore, Oct. 31, 1891.
[229] =Mekeel's Weekly Stamp News=, I: 43: 1.
[230] =ibid.=, I: 44: 2.
This would seem conclusive proof, and also serve as a means of detecting
any false error cards which might possibly be made from an uncut sheet
as printed--but which have never been found. Yet six months later we
find the _Monthly Journal_ making inquiries along practically the same
lines. This brought out the following reply in _The Postal Card_:--
By referring to our paper No. 55, issued on the 14th of May, 1890,
you will find there a copy of a letter received by us, from the
Secretary of the Post Office Department at Ottawa regarding this
very card as follows:
"I am directed to acknowledge your letter stating that you have in
your possession a Canadian reply post card, upon which the stamp
appears in the upper left-hand corner, and inquiring whether this
stamp was officially issued by the department, or whether the
position of the stamps was due to a mistake in cutting the sheets.
"In reply, I am to say that the position of the stamp on the card to
which you refer (a certain number of specimens of which were
inadvertently issued by this Department) was due to a mistake in
printing."
We have never seen one of these cards which could have been produced
by wrong cutting.
If any Error cards _have_ been made by such a manipulation, either
by accident or design, we do not know it. However, the difference
between a wrongly cut card and a genuine error is so apparent that
it can be detected even without the use of a millimetre scale.
The distance of the stamp from the end of the scroll on the error
card is 4 mm., while if produced by wrong cutting of a sheet of the
correct issue (stamp at right), the distance will be 14 mm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account