Canada: Its Postage Stamps and Postal StationeryHowes, Clifton A. (Clifton Armstrong)
History
Canada: Its Postage Stamps and Postal Stationery
Howes, Clifton A. (Clifton Armstrong)
Postage stamps -- Canada; Postal stationery -- Canada
Henry Hechler writes us as follows: "When the Indian outbreak in the
Northwest occurred in 1885, and some of the militia of the various
provinces were hurriedly ordered out for active service, stringent
measures for notifying the men calling for prompt attention had to
be adopted. To distinguish them from ordinary mail matter by showing
their official character they were stamped across the "adhesive"
with the word _Service_ and at the lower left corner _O. [H.] M. S.
only_. Some were thus printed in black, others in blue, and yet
others in red. They served for that purpose only, until an Act of
Parliament was passed to carry all military mail matter on active
service free."
Mr. Hechler was captain of one of the companies of the Halifax
Battalion, and, therefore, in a position to obtain definite
information.
[243] =American Philatelist=, II: 207.
In other words Mr. Hechler knew all about these "official" stamps and
the Postmaster-General and his secretary, as we have seen, knew
absolutely nothing about them! This seems to tell its own story. In fact
another letter from the Post Office Department, dated 13th April, 1888,
and published in this same volume of the _American Philatelist_,[244]
reiterates the denials of the previous letter which we have already
quoted. The _Philatelic Record_ received later,[245] from the
Postmaster of Halifax, the information that Mr. Hechler had had this
stationery surcharged and that it was neither issued nor recognized by
the Government of Canada. The _Record_ says:--"It was a smart notion of
Mr. Hechler to turn his military duties into the direction of his
business as a stamp dealer." Mr. Hechler "came back" at this in the
columns of the _Philatelic Journal of America_[246] with the statement
that "the Post Office Inspector here referred the question to
headquarters, and, in reply, was instructed to allow such matter to pass
through the mails without question or delay." The communication was
enclosed in one of the envelopes in question, but the Editor's remarks
on this are conclusive:--
The surcharging has not impaired the postal value of the envelope
and they are permitted to pass through the Canadian mails, but as to
their value from a philatelic standpoint it is quite another thing.
The printing in this case is of no more importance than any notice
or inscription that might be placed on an envelope bearing a regular
government stamp that in itself is sufficient to pay the postage.
In fact the above writer admits that the surcharge had no other
value than to enable the recipient to distinguish the letter from
his other mail. They are of no philatelic value whatever.
[244] =Ibid.=, II: 173.
[245] =Philatelic Record=, XI: 44.
[246] =Philatelic Journal of America=, V: 202.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account