Capturing a Locomotive: A History of Secret Service in the Late War. — John Shaqi
Capturing a Locomotive: A History of Secret Service in the Late War.Pittenger, William
History
Capturing a Locomotive: A History of Secret Service in the Late War.
Pittenger, William
Chattanooga Railroad Expedition, 1862; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Campaigns
During the day that succeeded my arrival in this place of horrors a few
more of our party were brought in, and among them was my especial
friend, George D. Wilson. I found that the same reason which had led to
the acknowledgment of my true character as a United States soldier had
induced them to make the same confession. Anxious and frequent were the
consultations we held as to the best course for us now to pursue. It was
too late for absolute denial of our participation in the railroad
adventure, even if that had ever been expedient. The only possible
course which seemed to offer any hope was to continue to claim the
character and protection of soldiers engaged in regular warfare, and to
this end answer all reasonable questions that might be asked. But there
were certain facts we pledged ourselves in no case to reveal. Among
these was the name of our engineer, which they were specially anxious
to ascertain. The fact of ignorance in such a material matter would
indicate that we were merely following the orders of those higher in
authority, and would preserve poor Brown, who had acted in that
capacity, from any special dangers. The fact of a previous expedition
having been sent down into Georgia upon the same errand as our own, was
on no account to be divulged, as it was likely to stimulate our captors
to inflict sterner punishments by way of preventing similar attempts in
future. We were not to allow it to escape that William Campbell was a
civilian only and not an enlisted soldier, as this would have made his
position more perilous than our own. We were also to conceal having
given any expressions of willingness to engage in such an expedition,
claiming to have been detailed without our own consent, and ordered to
obey the directions of a man placed over us. The most vital point was in
relation to Andrews. He had already admitted being the leader of the
expedition. We could, therefore, do him no good by pretending not to
know him, but he asked that we should not admit having any knowledge of
him before we were put under his orders; and, for our sake as well as
his, we resolved to "suppose" that he was some regularly commissioned
officer of the Federal army. Most of us knew him in his true
character,--that of a secret agent or spy. But to have admitted that
fact would have been fatal to any hopes he may have had, and would have
very seriously prejudiced our own case. The position we, therefore,
took, in all our statements, was that of non-commissioned officers and
soldiers belonging to three Ohio regiments, who had been detailed for an
unknown service, and ordered to report to an unknown officer, who had
called himself Andrews, and that we had faithfully and unquestioningly
obeyed such orders as had been given us. We agreed to urge that a flag
of truce should be sent to our lines to inquire if we were not what we
claimed to be, well knowing that, while General Mitchel would boldly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account