Caroline the Illustrious, vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Queen-Consort of George II. and sometime Queen-Regent; a study of her life and timeWilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
History
Caroline the Illustrious, vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Queen-Consort of George II. and sometime Queen-Regent; a study of her life and time
Wilkins, W. H. (William Henry)
Caroline, Queen, consort of George II, King of Great Britain, 1683-1737
Caroline grew very fond of Richmond. She interested herself closely
in the prosperity of the village, and in the welfare of its poorer
inhabitants, aiding the needy, and subscribing liberally to the schools
and charities. In later years she always came back to Richmond as
to home, and though her grandson George the Third, who resented her
attitude to his father Frederick Prince of Wales, tried to destroy
every sign of her occupation, it still remains identified with her
memory.
FOOTNOTES TO BOOK II, CHAPTER VIII:
[87] Letter of Lady Hervey to the Countess of Suffolk, Bath, 7th June,
1725.
[88] Letter of the Duchess of Orleans to the Raugravine Louise, Paris,
28th July, 1718.
[89] He was the author of the famous _Memoirs of the Reign of George
II_.
[90] Mary Bellenden (Mrs. John Campbell) to Mrs. Howard, Bath, 1720.
[91] _Suffolk Correspondence._
[92] Miss Howe to Mrs. Howard, The Holt, Farnham, 1719 (_Suffolk
Correspondence_).
[93] Master of the Horse to the Prince of Wales, eldest son of Lord
Scarborough.
[94] The Hon. Bridget Carteret, a maid of honour.
[95] Miss Howe to Mrs. Howard, The Holt, Farnham, 1st October, 1719.
[96] _Weekly Journal_ and _Saturday’s Post_, 13th June, 1719.
[97] Brice’s _Weekly Journal_, 30th December, 1719.
[98] The Countess of Bristol to the Earl of Bristol, Richmond, 14th
July, 1719.
[99] _Daily Post_, 23rd August, 1721.
CHAPTER IX.
THE RECONCILIATION.
1718–1720.
The life of the Princess of Wales at this time was apparently an
endless round of pleasure. Her days were full of interest and movement,
and in the eyes of the world she seemed perfectly happy. But she had
her secret sorrow, and a good deal of her gaiety was forced to please
her husband. He came first with her, but she was a devoted mother,
and there is abundant evidence to show that Caroline felt acutely the
separation from her children. The King would not allow them to visit
their parents, nor would he suffer the Prince to come and see them,
and upon the occasions when the Princess was admitted to St. James’s
or Kensington, to visit her children, he at first refused to receive
her. She went whenever she could spare an hour from her exacting duties
at Leicester House, but she had always to obtain leave from the King.
In spite of this separation the little princesses kept their love for
their parents, and always greeted their mother with demonstrations of
joy when she came, and cried bitterly when she went away. “The other
day,” writes the Duchess of Orleans, “the poor little things gathered
a basket of cherries and sent it to their father, with a message that
though they were not allowed to go to him, their hearts, souls and
thoughts were with their dear parents always.”[100] Every effort was
made by the Prince and Princess to obtain their children, and the law
was set in motion, but after tedious delays and protracted arguments,
the Lord Chief Justice, Parker, gave it as his opinion that the King
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account