Carranza, Venustiano, 1859-1920; Mexico -- History -- Revolution, 1910-1920; Mexico -- Politics and government -- 1910-1946
The foreign policy of the Great Powers towards small and weak nations,
with the exception of the United States, has been as a rule, that of
polite bullies and buccaneers. Great nations committed political acts,
which private individuals would not dare perpetrate. If the average
standard of the individual has been raised, that of the nations in
their international policy, has advanced very little from the times of
the cave dwellers.
Mexico being weak and torn by civil war since the inception of
her independence, has always suffered as much, if not more, from
foreigners, than from her own enemies. The French in the thirties and
sixties, the Americans in the forties, the Spaniards intermittently,
have brought trouble to Mexico. The Mexicans are always suspicious of
the international policy of the European powers.
When Huerta committed murder in the persons of the President and
Vice-President of Mexico, France, England, Germany and Spain rushed
to recognize him, so anxious were they to get in at the trough of
concessions. It was this conscienceless, greedy, sordid behavior which
disgusted Carranza in particular, and Mexicans in general. No action
in the history of the United States has created more sympathy for the
feared Yankees in Mexico and South America, than the refusal of the
recognition of Huerta on moral grounds. Carranza’s refusal to give an
account or to allow Villa to permit an investigation into the murders
of Benton and Bauche, was correct from an international standpoint.
England, who had so hastily recognized the murderer of a Mexican
President and Vice-President, became very indignant at the murder of a
naturalized Britisher who got into trouble through his own fault, and
expected the United States to demand satisfaction for it. Carranza, as
the first Chief, insisted that England should protest to him, as the
representative of the revolution, not to Villa or the United States.
The attitude of England, France, Germany and Spain towards Mexico, was
very arrogant and insulting; their protests to the United States were
quite expressive of their anxiety to have the United States intervene
and police Mexico in the same manner as had been done in Cuba.
The European powers were quite too busy watching their own frontiers to
embark on a foolish expedition like the threatened march and occupation
of Mexico City by the allied powers. The American papers came out time
after time announcing the landing of European marines in Mexico, in
case that the United States should not deem it expedient to protect
their interests. Any one familiar with European politics could have
guessed that the alarmist’s warning came either from the innermost
circles of the American military clique which had been itching for
intervention for the last four years, or from foreign chancellorships
who wanted to frighten the United States into a war with Mexico.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account