Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of WalesAnonymous
History
Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of Wales
Anonymous
Great Britain -- History
No place in the world could be more impregnable to an attack from the
sea. At the mouth of the roadstead there were three mighty forts. On a
low point of land, under the cliff on the northern side, rose the immense
work named Fort Constantine, showing 110 guns, in three casemated tiers,
with another tier on the roof. On the south shore, also low down, and
having a good command of the sea, first the Quarantine Fort, with its
sixty guns, and beyond that, Fort Alexander, with its ninety guns, defied
all assailants, so that in first line, an invading fleet would have to
encounter the fire of 260 guns, securely placed in solid works. Looking
from the sea, these three forts impressed the beholder with the strength
of the place. But these were not all. Beyond Alexander rose Fort Nicholas,
armed with 110 guns; and beyond this, Fort Paul, with its eighty-six guns,
standing at the mouth of the south bay. Altogether, there were no fewer
than 700 guns looking towards the sea from their secure casemates. Nor
should the small work, called the Wasp Battery, above Fort Constantine,
improvised on the spur of the moment, be overlooked. It deserved its name.
Such were the formidable defences which the allied fleets were to attack
in wooden ships, and which some sanguine persons expected them to reduce
to helplessness. No greater delusion could exist.
The real hour of trial had now come. The batteries of the Allies were
ready to open fire, and on the night of the 16th of October orders went
forth from both headquarters that the embrasures should be unmasked in the
obscurity of the dawn; that the troops in camp should be held in readiness
to fall in at a moment's notice ready to storm; that the fire of the land
batteries should open soon after six; and that the fleet, moving up,
should assail the great forts overlooking the sea. Both admirals, it is
understood, were opposed to this proceeding. They held the sound opinion
that the fleet could not effect anything against the forts. The safety of
the army, they said, depended on the safety of the fleet, and it would
be imprudent to risk the fleet in an encounter with forts so well placed
and so heavily armed. The mouth of the harbour was closed by the sunken
ships. A shoal, running out in front of Fort Constantine, prevented the
great men-of-war from placing themselves near enough to batter the walls
with effect. The sailing ships must be towed or propelled by steamers, and
would fight at a disadvantage. These arguments did not prevail. Admiral
Hamelin was under the absolute command of General Canrobert, and not at
liberty to disobey. Admiral Dundas was not under the absolute command of
Lord Raglan; but he could not well refrain from executing his wishes, or
look on while the French attacked. The allied generals were pressing in
their orders, as they held that an attack from the sea would operate as a
diversion, and favour the attack from the land. Therefore it was decided
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account