Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of WalesAnonymous
History
Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of Wales
Anonymous
Great Britain -- History
It was in these circumstances that Count Buol exerted himself at Vienna
to frame a plan of conciliation. He took the draft of a note drawn up
by M. Drouyn de Lhuys, and by the aid of the representatives of the
Four Powers at Vienna, and after frequent communication with London and
Paris, he constructed out of this draft a note which he hoped would prove
acceptable alike to Russia and Turkey. The design was to ascertain whether
the Czar would accept the note, and if he agreed to do so, to send it to
Constantinople, accompanied by urgent recommendations from the Four Powers
to the Porte advising its acceptance. In taking this course, Austria acted
as mediator at the request, or at least with the assent, of Russia; but
the Russian Ambassador at Vienna would not attend the Conference, and his
master was only represented there by a sort of friend. After great labour
the note was framed, and a copy sent to St. Petersburg. The Powers took
steps immediately to ascertain whether the Czar would accept the note, and
they found that, although it did not give him satisfaction, he was content
to accept it in a spirit of conciliation, as an arrangement devised by
a friendly Government; and he was willing to take it from the hands of
a Turkish Ambassador, provided it were not altered in any way. This was
the famous "Vienna Note" which attracted so much attention, and raised so
many hopes in the summer of 1853. But while Austria and the other Powers
had consulted Russia and learnt her views, they had forgotten Turkey,
for whose benefit the thing was supposed to be devised. They had not
ascertained whether Turkey would or could sign it, and, indeed, in framing
it, the Powers seemed more anxious to devise a form of words satisfactory
to the Czar than safe in the eyes of the Sultan. And so, when it reached
Constantinople, although backed by strong advices from all the Powers,
and not least by England, the Porte declined to sign it, except in an
amended form, which Lord Stratford de Redcliffe drew up, and to which the
representatives of the Four Powers at the Porte agreed. The note, indeed,
was found to confer rights on Russia almost as extensive as those she
claimed through Prince Menschikoff. Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, although
he saw this, scrupulously executed the instructions of his Government,
and pressed the note on the Porte. But the Sultan, the Ministers, and the
Grand Council were firm. After much deliberation, the Grand Council, of
sixty members, comprising the most distinguished statesmen of the capital,
adopted a form of note embodying their views, but rather deferring to
the plan suggested at Vienna. "If the decision," wrote Lord Stratford
de Redcliffe, on the 20th of August, "does not completely represent the
feeling of this country, it only fails in being framed with too much
forbearance and moderation."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account