Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of WalesAnonymous
History
Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of Wales
Anonymous
Great Britain -- History
Nothing shows more clearly how far, although still professing identical
views, the German Powers were separated from England and France, than the
fact that Count Buol and Baron Manteuffel, after they were aware of the
interpretation put on it by Russia, moved by the emphatic language of
Count Nesselrode, did once more urge the Porte to sign the original note,
and thus to sign away its independence. Far from being in real concert in
August, they were less in concert with the Western Powers in the middle of
September. The only Power which acted straight through with Britain was
France, and the only divergence of policy apparent was this--the French
Government did not seem to think the pace of the alliance fast enough, and
were constantly urging the transmission of orders to the admirals to enter
the Dardanelles. The plea was that the anchorage at Besika was unsafe.
But this was seen to be absurd, and twice Lord Clarendon resisted the
appeals sent by Louis Napoleon with the view of forcing the fleets upon
the Sultan, and depriving Lord Stratford de Redcliffe of any discretion
in the matter. This occurred during the negotiations on the new aspect
imparted to affairs by the Russian acceptance and the Turkish rejection
of the note. The German Powers, knowing what was the interpretation put
upon the note by Russia, persisted in pressing it upon the Sultan. The
Western Powers, always more respectful to Turkey, would not take part
in this move: indeed, they could not do so. Count Nesselrode's comments
on the modified note, showing that the Emperor of Russia did desire to
seek new rights and extended power in Turkey, had proved to Britain and
France that the apprehensions of the Porte, so far from being groundless,
were justified by the Russian construction. Instead of asking the
Porte, as they were disposed to do before they were in possession of the
Russian views, to reconsider its decision, they now asked the Emperor
to reconsider his. Austria, on the contrary, declared that if the Porte
again disregarded her counsels, she should consider her efforts to effect
a reconciliation at an end: further, that if Britain and France would
not support her in this step, there would be an end to the conference at
Vienna. In this opinion Britain and France agreed, and the conference at
Vienna came to an end accordingly. The German Powers went one way, the
Western Powers another; both professed to be hastening towards the same
goal, but the German Powers went astray, whereas the Western Powers kept
in the straight path. The secret of this was the personal ascendency which
the Czar exercised over the German Courts, and which diverted them from
their true course on the Eastern Question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account