Inheritance and succession -- Fiction; Marriage -- Fiction
"Pray don't mention it, my dear sir--my dear sir. I shan't bring any
action for assault and battery. You see, my dear sir,"--Trump got very
affectionate here, as he had just played his winning card--"we are
accustomed to these little emotions now and then. But to return to what
I was saying, Mr Markworth, it is a very unfortunate circumstance for
you; the son Tom was born on the 27th August, 1847, and Susan, the
daughter, on the 29th August, '46, and your mistake probably thus arose;
but I can't help feeling glad on my clients behalf, that your marriage
took place the day before Susan Hartshorne came of age. Consequently
you must admit it, as she did not marry with her mother's consent, the
marriage being, indeed, after an elopement, and our client, being ready
to prove that it was entirely without her consent or knowledge, Susan
Hartshorne--as your wife--has forfeited all right to the twenty thousand
pounds mentioned in her father's will."
Markworth seemed to be quite dazed. This sudden blow to all his
expectations quite unnerved him. He spoke absently, as if in a dream.
"Have you got the proofs?" he said abruptly; for he knew all the
consequences which his oversight would entail. "Where are the papers?"
"Here is the certificate of her birth," said the lawyer, producing it as
he spoke, "dated the 29th August, 1846. Here is also the written
evidence of her mother, Mrs Hartshorne, and here, too, the old Family
Bible, with the date and entry of her birth inscribed in it, by the hand
of the late Squire Roger Hartshorne, as I myself can testify. Quite
sufficient evidence, Mr Markworth, in any court of law, to establish
the date of Susan Hartshorne's birth, and the consequent failure of your
little plan to get her fortune. Very unfortunate, Mr Markworth! Very
unfortunate!"
And the lawyer rubbed his hands with triumph, and smiled as if he was
telling his victim a piece of remarkably good news.
Markworth never took any notice of the lawyer's words. He examined
eagerly the papers before him; and when he saw the convincing entry in
the family Bible, he gave up. The figure 9 in the date "29th August,"
might easily have been taken for a 7, and he cursed Clara Kingscott for
making the mistake, which she had very naturally made in this instance
quite unintentionally, and without any thought as to the effects of the
error.
He bore his defeat bravely, however, although all his schemes were thus
dashed to the ground when they were trembling on the verge of success.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account