Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnologySkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnology
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
The natural inference from an examination of Bede’s Ecclesiastical
History is that apparently he knew of no Picts south of the Firth of
Forth. He certainly mentions none, and expressly says (B. iv. c.
xxvi.), in describing the result of the defeat and death of Ecgfrid,
king of Northumbria, by the Picts in 686, that Trumwine, with his
Angles, fled from the monastery of Abercorn, ‘posito quidem in regione
Anglorum, sed in vicinia freti quod Anglorum terras Pictorumque
disterminat;’ but he is here talking of the territories belonging to
each kingdom, and not of the distribution of the population; and as
the territory of Galloway undoubtedly belonged to the Anglic kingdom,
its population must have been either a subject British or Pictish
population, as Bede elsewhere implies that twenty years later it was
but partially occupied by Angles. In another work, however, Bede
clearly implies that the population of Galloway was Pictish at that
time. In his Life of St. Cuthbert (cap. xi.) he says, ‘Quodam etenim
tempore pergens de suo monasterio pro necessitatis causa accidentis ad
terram Pictorum, qui Niduari vocantur navigando pervenit.’ His
monastery was Melrose. Mr. E. W. Robertson was inclined to think that
St. Cuthbert had sailed from the mouth of the Tweed, and been driven
northwards by contrary winds into the Firth of Tay, landing near
Abernethy, on the coast of Fife, the inhabitants of the banks of the
Nethy probably being the ‘Picti qui Niduari vocantur;’ and he refers
in a note to a suggestion of the author’s that Cuthbert may have
crossed the Firth of Forth and landed at Newburn, the old name of
which was Nithbren (_Scotland under her Early Kings_, vol. ii. p.
383), but a more careful consideration has satisfied him that neither
view is tenable. Bede says (B. i. c. xv.), ‘De Jutarum origine sunt
Cantuari et Victuari, hoc est, ea gens quæ Vectam tenet insulam et ea
quæ usque hodie in provincia Occidentalium Saxonum Jutarum natio
nominatur, posita contra ipsam insulam Vectam.’ Now, the term Niduari
is a word evidently formed in precisely the same way from the root
Nid, as Cantuari and Vectuari are from the roots Cantia and Vecta, and
certainly signifies the ‘gens’ on the Nid, which can only mean the
river Nith, now forming the eastern boundary of Galloway, and which
separated it in the lower part of its course from the Strathclyde
kingdom. Ptolemy terms the river Nith ‘Novius;’ and from this in the
same way was formed the name ‘Novantæ,’ a tribe which occupied the
territory from the ‘Novius,’ which here separated them from the
Selgovæ, to the Irish Sea. As the name Nith is the equivalent of
Ptolemy’s ‘Novius,’ so Bede’s ‘Niduari’ is the exact equivalent of
Ptolemy’s ‘Novantæ;’ and the author does not now doubt that they were
the same people to whom the name of ‘Picti’ was likewise applied. In
either view St. Cuthbert had to go some distance by land from Melrose
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account