Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnologySkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnology
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
The MSS. differ so much that it is impossible to give a correct
quotation, and the reader is referred to any of the recent additions
of Nennius. The settlement of the Dam Hoctor, or company of eight, was
probably that in Gwyned or North Wales, which he afterwards states was
driven out by Cuneda, as was the settlement in ‘regione Dimetorum’ or
S. Wales. That by Istoreth in Dalmeta or Dalrieta was the same as that
described by Bede. The Irish translator, in transferring the first to
Ireland, and in connecting the latter with the Picts, is probably
making alterations at his own hand; but is right in identifying the
settlers of Builc in Eubonia with the Firbolg who fled to the isles of
Man, Arran, and others.
Footnote 135:
Bede, _Hist. Ec._ B. i. c. 1.
Footnote 136:
_Chron. Picts and Scots_, p. 18.
Footnote 137:
Feargus mor mac Earca cum gente Dalriada partem Britanniæ tenuit et
ibi mortuus est.—_Chron. Picts and Scots_, p. 66.
Footnote 138:
The tripartite life of St. Patrick contains an account of the
conversion of Erc and his people by St. Patrick.—_Ib._ p. 17.
Footnote 139:
The tale told by the Irish historians is this:—Conare, son of
Mogalama, chief of a tribe of Munster Scots called the Degada, became
king of Ireland, and reigned eight years, from 158 to 165. He had
three sons: Cairbre Musc, from whom descend all the septs of the
Muscraidhe in Munster; Cairbre Baschaein, from whom descend the
Baiscnidh of Corco Baiscinn in Munster; and Cairbre Riada, who
established himself with his sept in Ulster, and whose possessions
there were termed Dalriada. He is said to have passed over to Argyll
and settled the Scots there, and is the Reuda of Bede. Pinkerton
adopts this story, and dates their earliest colony in 258. He
identifies it with the Attacotti, which he absurdly explains to
mean—Hither Scots, and in this Mr. Burton seems disposed to follow
him; but this part of his argument is based entirely upon the spurious
Richard of Cirencester. Chalmers, with more judgment, rejects it, and
in fact there is no authority for it in the Irish Annals. The Scotch
Chronicles are opposed to it. The oldest which gives the Dalriadic
history expressly says of Fergus, son of Erc, ‘ipse fuit _primus_ qui
de semine Chonare suscepit regnum Alban.’ The Albanic Duan knows of no
earlier colony than that under the sons of Erc. Flann Mainistrech and
Tighernac know nothing of it, nor do the Irish additions made to
Nennius. Gildas, too, knows nothing of it. It is to be found in
Nennius and Bede alone, and the Irish translator neutralises Nennius’s
statement of a settlement of Scots in Dalrieta under Istoreth, son of
Istorinus, by converting it into a settlement of Picts, while he
removes the colony of Dam Hoctor, or the company of eight, from
Britannia to Erin. The only Irish authority which at all points to an
earlier settlement is the curious legend contained in Cormac’s
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account