Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and cultureSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and culture
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
The distribution of the churches among the Picts which were dedicated to
St. Peter will show the extent to which the country at this time adopted
him as their patron. Among the southern Picts we have Invergowry,
Tealing, Restennot, and Meigle. Among the northern Picts we have in
Aberdeen and Banff, Cultyr, Fivy and Inverugie; and in Moray and Ross,
Drumdelgy, Ruthven, Glenbucket, Belty, Inverawen, Duffus and Rosemarky.
King Nectan himself is said by the Irish annalist Tighernac to have
become a cleric in the year 724,[437] and probably retired to the church
which he had built after the Roman manner by the architects sent him
from Northumbria, and which, as he had promised to dedicate that church
to St. Peter, must have been one of these we have named, either
Restennot or Rosemarky.
[Sidenote: Second influence: the Anachoretical life.]
These legends having thus so far indicated the external influence which
led to the introduction of the secular clergy into the church among the
Picts, we must now advert to another and more powerful influence of an
opposite kind, which arose within the Monastic Church itself, and
equally tended to break in upon the monastic character of that church.
This influence was that increasing asceticism which led the monks to
forsake the cœnobitical life for the solitary cell of the anchorite, and
induced those who wished to pass from a secular to a religious life to
prefer this more ascetic form of it. This form of the religious life had
long existed in the Christian Church, and, from a very early period,
there prevailed a feeling that the solitary life in the desert, or in
the anchorite’s cell, was a higher form of the religious life than that
afforded by the cœnobitical life of the monastery. Thus St. Jerome,
writing in the fourth century, tells us that ‘there were in Egypt three
kinds of monks. First, the Cœnobites, whom they call in the Gentile
tongue Sausses but whom we may term those living in common. Secondly,
the Anchorites, who live alone in desert places, and are so called as
living apart from men; and, thirdly, that kind which are called
Remoboth, the worst and most neglected;’[438] and John Cassian, a native
of Scythia, who founded two monasteries at Marseilles, one for men and
the other for virgins, and died about the year 440, writing what he
terms ‘Conferences with the Monks,’ speaks, in his eighteenth, of the
different sorts of monks in his day. He likewise distinguishes them into
three sorts. First the Cœnobites, who live in common, under an abbot,
imitating the life of the apostles. Second, Anchorites, who, after they
have been instructed and educated in monasteries, withdraw into the
deserts. The authors of this order were St. Paul the hermit and St.
Anthony. And third, the Sarabaites, who pretended to retire from the
world, and joined themselves together by two or three in a company, to
live after their own humour, not being subject to any man. He looks upon
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account