Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and cultureSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and culture
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
_Ceile_, as a substantive, means literally, ‘socius, maritus,’ but it
has a secondary meaning, ‘servus,’ and as an adverb it means
‘pariter.’ Dr. Reeves, in his work on the British Culdees, adopts the
secondary meaning, and considers that it is simply the Irish
equivalent of Servus Dei, which, he says, was the ordinary expression
for a monk, and hence starts with the assumption that the _Ceile De_
were simply monks. This is one of the very few instances in which the
author has found himself unable to accept a dictum of Dr. Reeves. This
rendering appears to him objectionable—first, because no example can
be produced in which the term Servus Dei appears translated by _Ceile
De_; secondly, that the term _Ceile De_ is applied to a distinct class
who were not very numerous in Ireland, while the term Servus Dei is a
general expression applicable to religious of all classes, and
included, as we have seen, the secular canons as well as the monks.
Ebrard rejects the rendering by Servus Dei, and supposes that it is
the Irish equivalent of Vir Dei; but this is still more objectionable.
Vir Dei was a term applied to all saints of whatever class; and in the
Litany of Angus, who himself bore the name of _Ceile De_, or the
Culdee, it is translated _Fer De_, but in the glosses on the Felire of
Angus the word _Ceile_ is glossed _Carait_, or friend; and the author
long ago came to the conclusion that, though not etymologically
identic, it is the Irish equivalent of _Deicola_, God-worshipper, in
its primary meaning, that is, in the sense of companionship or near
connection with God. The late Dr. Joseph Robertson, when he was
preparing the Introduction to the _Statuta_, came by an independent
inquiry to the same result (see Introduction, vol. i. p. ccxii.); and
the author cannot help thinking that, had it not been for the
etymological considerations which weighed with Dr. Reeves, his
historical inquiry would have brought him to the same conclusion.
Footnote 475:
Colgan, _A.SS._, p. 454.
Footnote 476:
_Leabhar Breac_, part ii. p. 261. Dr. Reeves has printed the part that
relates to the _Cele De_ from a different MS., with a translation, in
his _British Culdees_, p. 82.
Footnote 477:
A.D. 869 Comgan fota Ancorita Tamlachta quievit.—_An. Ult._ 2 August,
Comgan _Cele De_.—_Mart. Tam._ A.D. 1031 _Cond na mbocht, cend Celed
nDe agus Ancoiri Cluana mic Nois_.—_An. F. M._, vol. ii. p. 525.
Footnote 478:
_An. Ult. ad an._ 921.
Footnote 479:
Reeves’s _British Culdees_, Pref. p. ix.
Footnote 480:
Elarius ancorita et scriba Locha Crea.—_An. Ult. ad an._ 806.
Footnote 481:
_Topog. Hib._, dist. 2, c. 4.
Footnote 482:
Reeves’s _British Culdees_, p. 79.
Footnote 483:
Printed with translations in Dr. Reeves’s _History of the British
Culdees_, p. 84.
Footnote 484:
Compare the rule in page 84 with canons of the Council of
Aix-la-Chapelle.
Footnote 485:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account