Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and cultureSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and culture
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
‘It appears to have been a wonderful dispensation of the Divine
goodness, that the same nation which had wittingly and without envy
communicated to the people of the Angles the knowledge of the true
Deity, should afterwards, by means of the nation of the Angles, be
brought, in those points on which they were defective, to the rule of
life;’ such is the reflection of the Venerable Bede when contemplating
the change which had taken place in the Columban Church in the beginning
of the eighth century, which he thus expresses: ‘The monks of _Hii_, or
Iona, by the instruction of Ecgberct, adopted the Catholic rites under
Abbot Dunchad, about eighty years after they had sent Bishop Aidan to
preach to the nation of the Angles.’[505] He had previously stated that,
not long after the year 710, ‘those monks also of the Scottish nation
who lived in the island of Hii, with the other monasteries that were
subject to them, were, by the procurement of our Lord, brought to the
canonical observance of Easter and the right mode of tonsure;[506] and
this had been effected by the most reverend and holy father and priest
Ecgberct, of the nation of the Angles, who had long lived in banishment
in Ireland for the sake of Christ, and was most learned in the
Scriptures and distinguished for the perfection of a long life, and who
came among them, corrected their error, and changed them to the true and
canonical day of Easter.’[507] Bede implies that this took place in the
year 716; but the change was not so general or so instantaneous as might
be inferred from this statement. The monks of Iona, or a part of them at
least, had certainly in that year adopted the Catholic Easter;[508] but
it is not till two years after that date, and a year after the death of
Abbot Dunchad, that they adopted the coronal tonsure. The expression of
the Irish annalist who records the event rather implies that it had been
forced upon an unwilling community;[509] and, so far from the other
monasteries that were subject to them having generally submitted to the
change in 716, the resistance of those within the territories of the
Pictish king to the royal edict commanding the adoption of the Catholic
Easter and the coronal tonsure throughout all the provinces of the Picts
led to the expulsion of ‘the family of Iona’—by which expression the
Columban monks are meant—from the Pictish kingdom in 717. This conflict
then appears to have led to two results. In the first place, it
separated the churches of the eastern districts from Iona, broke up the
unity of the Columban Church, and terminated the supremacy of the parent
monastery of Iona over the churches in the Pictish kingdom, which had
been subject to them; and, in the second place, it seems undoubtedly to
have caused a schism in the community on the island, as such innovations
usually do when the attempt to force upon an entire body the views of a
majority is sure to be met by a resisting minority.
[Sidenote: Two parties with rival abbots.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account