Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and cultureSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and culture
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
She also introduced the crucifix into the
church, having presented one to this church richly ornamented with gold
and silver intermixed with precious stones; and similar crucifixes she
left to other churches, ‘as marks of her piety and devotion, of which
the church of St. Andrews affords an instance, where a beautiful
crucifix which she there erected is still to be seen.’[663] Her
attention, however, appears to have been soon directed towards the state
of the Scottish Church generally, in which she naturally found many
practices, peculiar to the old Celtic Church, which differed from those
she was accustomed to see in the church in which she had been reared.
Estimated by the standard of that church, they appeared to her ‘to be
contrary to the rules of the true faith as well as to the sacred customs
of the universal church,’ and she sought, by frequent councils, to have
them rectified. Her biographer tells us that ‘at the principal council
thus held she, with a few of her own ecclesiastics, contended for three
days with the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God, against the
supporters of these strange customs; while her royal husband, who was
equally well acquainted with the Anglic language and with his native
Gaelic, acted as interpreter.’[664]
Margaret began by pointing out that they who agreed with the Catholic
Church in worshipping one God, in one faith, should not differ in regard
to certain new and strange practices. And she, first of all, ‘explained
they did not rightly observe the forty days’ fast, inasmuch as they did
not commence the fast, with holy church everywhere, on Ash Wednesday,
but on Monday in the following week. To which they replied, that what
they observed was a six weeks’ fast, on the authority of the Gospels
which narrate the fast of Christ. The queen answers that they differed
widely in this from the Gospel: for it is read thus, that our Lord
fasted forty days, which it is obvious you do not; for, if the six
Sundays during the six weeks are deducted from the fast, there only
remain thirty-six days for you to observe the fast. It is necessary,
therefore, to add four days to the time at which you commence the fast,
if you would follow the Lord’s example by fasting forty days; otherwise
you alone repudiate the authority of our Lord and the tradition of the
entire holy church. Convinced by this clear exposition of the truth,
they thenceforward commenced the solemn period of the Lenten fast at the
same time with the holy church everywhere.’ Here the whole point is
whether, as the Catholic Church at this time never fasted on the Lord’s
day, the Sundays should be counted in computing the forty days’ fast of
Lent, or not. That the forty days’ fast of our Saviour was a continuous
fast, is obvious, and in this the Scottish Church followed the
recognised practice of the earlier church. The queen then urged another
point, and ‘required them to explain why they refrained from partaking
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account